Amnesty International is calling for an independent parliamentary inquiry into Covid-19 deaths in Italian nursing homes and reports of retaliation against nursing home staff who spoke out about unsafe conditions there.
Amnesty based its findings on interviews with 34 health care workers, as well as union leaders and lawyers. A third of the workers "raised concerns about a climate of fear and retaliation in their workplace", Amnesty said in a statement on Friday.
Italy's nursing homes, like those elsewhere in Europe, the US and beyond, saw a major share of Covid-19 deaths, and prosecutors in dozens of jurisdictions have opened criminal investigations into whether the deaths could have been prevented.
Italy was the first country in the West to be hit by the outbreak and soon found itself critically short of protective equipment, face masks and hospital beds, particularly in the hardest-hit Lombardy region.
During the first wave of contagion, many residents of elderly care facilities in Lombardy were not even taken to the hospital because there was no room for them.
In addition to the high toll on nursing home residents, Amnesty said some employees who complained about lack of protective equipment or raised other concerns about unsafe working conditions in the facilities were subjected to disciplinary proceedings.
One case cited by Amnesty concerned the suspension of Pietro La Grassa, a union representative at Milan's Pio Albergo Trivulzio nursing home, Italy's largest.
Italian prosecutors opened a criminal investigation into the Trivulzio home after La Grassa and a handful of doctors and employees raised alarm about high numbers of deaths early on in the outbreak.
Some alleged that managers had told them not to wear masks for fear of spooking residents, a charge management denied.
Milan prosecutors recently decided to close their Trivulzio investigation without filing any charges, Italian news agency Ansa reported on October 18.
La Grassa was ordered to be reinstated in his job by a Milan tribunal in December 2020.
Overall, the death toll among residents of elderly care facilities is not known, since residents were not tested early on in the outbreak and suspected Covid-19 deaths do not feature into Italy's official count
Italy's Superior Institute of Health found that at least 9,154 people died in nursing homes from February-May 2020, but that survey was based on partial responses to a voluntary survey of a quarter of Italy's estimated 4,600 nursing homes.
Amnesty's call for a parliamentary inquiry follows a decision by lawmakers in July to greatly limit the scope of a parliamentary commission of inquest into the pandemic to merely look into the events prior to January 30 2020, when the government declared a state of emergency and suspended flights to and from China.
As a result, the Italian inquiry will not consider the actual outbreak in Italy or how it was handled here, since the first locally transmitted case was only confirmed in northern Lombardy in late February.
Last week, relatives of victims launched an online petition for Parliament to return to the original scope of an inquiry into the causes of the outbreak here and the actions taken by the government and World Health Organisation to try to limit it.
Aside from that, the consumer rights group Codacons has been gathering data on behalf of relatives of people who died in elderly care homes and has turned the information over to prosecutors.
If those cases ever reach trial, the relatives could join the prosecution as injured parties in the civil portion of the case.
Separately, one class-action lawsuit against the government, health ministry and Lombardy region, filed on behalf of some 500 relatives of victims, has begun in Rome's civil tribunal.
The only other major criminal investigation is being handled by prosecutors in hard-hit Bergamo province looking into Italy's preparedness and whether a delayed lockdown there helped fuel the contagion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here