I READ Joanna Blythman’s article ("We must not allow this man to poison Scotland’s water with fluoride", The Herald, October 23) with increasing incredulity and anger.
Her opening diatribe about Sajid Javid’s lack of medical expertise can be equally applied to herself and her prejudices can be equally manipulated by the many so-called experts she quotes. There are very many more learned and well researched papers on the other side of the argument from that which she supports.
She writes that the United States currently adjusts the fluoride levels in most tap water to the proven most effective level of one part per million and then announces that the US Protection Agency is currently being sued in the US Federal Court by Food and Water Watch, but omits to mention that there has never been a successful anti-fluoride lawsuit in the US in all the years since this public health measure was first introduced in 1945, or since becoming US public health policy in 1951. By 2018 73% of the US population received water to the recommended level of 0.7 milligrams per litre added fluoride. Surely if the adjustment of the fluoride content in water gave rise to the multiple problems that Ms Blythman quotes there would have been at least one successful lawsuit in that most litigious country in the 70 years since this fluoridation became US policy?
I would suggest that anyone in doubt about the efficacy and safety of this measure should look up the website of America’s health rankings: www.americashealthrankings.org. Its advisory council includes many eminent individuals with medical and public health qualifications and a high level of expertise – in marked contrast to the lobbyists of Food and Water Watch.
As a retired dentist with many years service in general dental practice I would love to see the day when it is no longer necessary to rip multiple badly-decayed teeth from the jaws of young children, the most common operation requiring general anaesthesia in children in the West of Scotland, so traumatising them and creating many lifelong dental phobics.
The fact that this assault is rare in the US is testimony to the efficacy of this safe public health measure.
Alastair I MacLean, Former Scottish Secretary of the British Dental Association, Scone.
COP26 WILL BE A WASTE OF TIME
WHAT a monstrous waste of time, money and worse still, energy the forthcoming COP26 will certainly be. Nothing of any value will be achieved as the crucial main player, Xi Jinping, remains firmly at home in China, proceeding merrily to sign off yet more coal mines. His "we will be carbon neutral by 2060" fools nobody and may well be far too late. Yes, China is one of the main users of electric cars and has huge renewable resources. However, it still the biggest polluter by a large margin. Australia's Scott Morrison is a last-minute, probably reluctant, addition and Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro remains wired to the moon and in charge of deforestation on a biblical scale. God apparently is his judge.
The whole gathering will subject Glaswegians to much misery and almost certainly a huge spike in Covid. Greta Thunberg can be an annoying wee besom, but she is spot on with her "blah, blah, blah" comments. She is correct in saying that little positive action will actually result from this charade.
We can only hope the general world population can come up with ideas to "save the planet". Projects such as the Duke of Cambridge's Earthshot Prize might just be the best way forward as it encouraged many innovative people to come up with brilliant solutions. Humans have the intellect and technology to make the difference. But do politicians and billionaires have the foresight, will or even the nous to fund it?
Ian Smith, Symington.
A RINGING ENDORSEMENT
WHAT unimagined power being the school bell-ringer confers. In the sixth form at school I was made school bell-ringer. The school, an Edwardian building, was divided into two blocks, north and south, and it was quite a scoot to run from one to the other to press the respective electric bell buttons. Then there was the quick dash outside with the handbell to summon the lasses from the sports field.
Occasionally the power failed and the handbell had to be whizzed from one block to the other. I had to be in school earlier than the other pupils to ring the assembly bells and was a bit later leaving after ringing the end-of-day ones. I am very satisfied to read that I was once one of the "benevolent, godlike entities with bells", mentioned by Rab McNeil ("Liberty bell", Herald Magazine, October 23). It gives me my only possible claim to fame and a sort of satisfaction that I might have actually terrified a few of my fellow pupils; shy little flower that I was in those days.
Which reminds that I need to replace the batteries in my front-door bell. A neighbour has just mentioned that it isn't working.
Thelma Edwards, Kelso.
DIVINE INTERVENTION
I ALWAYS enjoy reading Dr Gerald Edwards’s letters even though I seldom agree with his views. His latest on the subject of the NHS accompanied by his name and usual title (October 25) suggested to me that he may have medical experience (or not as the case may be).
It reminds me of an incident many years ago when I was on board a North Sea ferry to Hull when I responded to a call for a “medical doctor” to attend a lady with a severe nosebleed. I asked why “medical” had been emphasised and was told that the previous week a similar call for a “doctor” had produced a clergyman who said he was a Doctor of Divinity.
Colin Sykes (retired consultant physician), Eaglesham.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel