Australia has ruled out promising to cut methane emissions by 30% by the end of the decade in a stance that will add to criticism that the country is too slow in addressing climate change.
Minister for Industry, Energy and Emissions Reduction Angus Taylor announced his government's decision before he was to fly with Prime Minister Scott Morrison to a UN climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland.
The United States and the European Union pledged in September to the 30% methane reduction target.
Mr Taylor said the only way Australia could achieve that target would be to reduce numbers of cattle and sheep.
Writing in The Australian newspaper, he said: "At present, almost half of Australia's annual methane emissions come from the agriculture sector, where no affordable, practical and large-scale way exists to reduce it other than by culling herd sizes.
"What activists in Australia and elsewhere want is an end to the beef industry."
Australia is one of the world's largest exporters of coal and liquified natural gas.
The gas and mining sector account for almost one third of Australia's methane emissions.
Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce said his Nationals party, the conservative government's junior coalition partner, had insisted Mr Morrison not commit to reducing methane at the Glasgow summit, known as Cop26.
Inaction on methane was one of the conditions the rural-based Nationals had placed on support for Mr Morrison's Liberal Party's target of net zero emissions by 2050.
"The only way you can get your 30% by 2030 reduction in methane on 2020 levels would be to go and grab a rifle, go out and start shooting your cattle because it's just not possible," Mr Joyce said.
But Meat and Livestock Australia - a Sydney-based producer-owned company that provides marketing, research and development services to over 50,000 cattle, sheep and goat farmers - said the Australian red meat industry was pursuing its own net zero target for 2030.
"This target means that by 2030, Australian beef, lamb and goat production, including lot feeding and meat processing, will make no net release of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere," the company website said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here