I am astonished that Iain M MacIver, factor of Stornoway Trust Estate, is questioning the integrity of the crofters of the Galson and Barvas estates (Letters, January 18). The 730 crofters who publicly declared their intention to challenge this proposal are from these two estates, a fact made quite clear in our press release of July 2007.
Mr Maciver has no authority, therefore, to claim I presented misleading information in my letter (January 16), or attempted to "distort the truth". Our crofters have had years to consider the "lucrative" income that we could "enjoy" if this wind farm were granted, and we have said no each time we were asked. Sixteen surveys or ballots have all yielded overwhelming opposition to this project, comprehensively backed up by more than 13,000 objections submitted to the government - with only 77 letters in support - hardly the "widespread support at both national and local level" which he claims this project has.
We are not for sale, at any price. We are not the "needy" yokels that Mr Maciver claims, nor will we be bought by dangling "lucrative" carrots as bait to encourage us to capitulate. We most certainly do not share his views that building 181 giant turbines, digging miles of roads, drains and ditches, pylons, excavating five huge quarries (each up to a mile long) would be "managing the moorland to the benefit of our environment".
In any case, Mr Maciver would do well to hark back to comments he made on the BBC TV programme Cunntas (recorded in Barvas in 2005), where he stated: "Furthermore, none of this could ever go ahead, and still can't, without the crofters' agreement. It won't go ahead without the agreement of crofters."
Dina Murray, 49 North Galson, Isle of Lewis.
It is disappointing that the factor of Stornoway Trust, Iain M MacIver, chooses to dismiss what most people would see as a reasonable take on the controversial Hebridean wind farm debate.
Iain is also wrong to suggest that local Hebridean opinion is in favour of the North Lewis wind farm: the opposite is true and for all three of the proposed industrial scale windfarms - North Lewis (AMEC), Eisgin (Estate Landowner) and Pairc (SSE).
The likelihood is that after 25 years we'll be left with the detritus. Corporate ploys are easily devised to get around expensive decommissioning and taxpayers' money may have to be used to clean up - see nuclear power industry for more details.
I was brought up to believe that a basic tenet of crofting is to leave the land in as good a shape as you found it, or better, for the benefit of future generations. We hold the land in trust.
Iain Mackenzie, 24 Fair-a-Far Cottages, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article