According to research from Nationwide Building Society, first time buyers face spending at least six times their annual wages to get on the property ladder in nearly half of Britain’s local authority areas.
In 2016, just over a third of local authority areas had average house price-to-earnings ratios of six or more.
However, East Ayrshire is the most affordable place for first time buyers in Britain, with Kilmarnock and Cumnock being the biggest areas.
Buyers looking to purchase a home in East Ayrshire would spend just under two and a half times of their earnings.
Edinburgh was revealed to be the least affordable place in Scotland.
Andrew Harvey, a senior economist at Nationwide, said: “East Ayrshire, in Scotland, continues to be the most affordable authority in Great Britain, with average first time buyer house prices just 2.4 times average earnings.
“East Ayrshire covers a large geographic area to the south of Glasgow, but its main towns are Kilmarnock and Cumnock.”
He said that, in Scotland, Aberdeen has seen the biggest improvement in housing affordability since 2016, largely due to house price falls there.
How does Scotland compare with the rest of Britain?
The London borough of Kensington and Chelsea is the least affordable place for first time buyers.
Buyers would be looking at paying almost a whopping 15 times their earnings to buy a home in Kensington and Chelsea.
Least affordable local authority areas
- London, Kensington and Chelsea
- South East, Oxford
- East of England, Hertsmere
- South West, Cotswold
- East Midlands, Rutland
- Yorkshire and the Humber, Ryedale
- West Midlands, Malvern Hills
- North West, South Lakeland
- Wales, Vale of Glamorgan
- Scotland, City of Edinburgh
- North East, North Tyneside
Most affordable local authority areas
- Scotland, East Ayrshire
- North West, Copeland
- North East, County Durham
- Wales, Merthyr Tydfil
- Yorkshire and the Humber, Barnsley
- West Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent
- East Midlands, Bolsover
- East of England, Great Yarmouth
- South West, Swindon
- South East, Southampton
- London, Bromley
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article