YOUR front page story today about nuclear power, and the impending complete lack of it in Scotland ("SNP failed to study impact of nuclear plant closures on bills", The Herald, February 17), is long overdue. Failure to build nuclear power stations has been the greatest strategic failure in terms of energy by Scottish and UK governments of all stripes for the past 40 years. So it’s no surprise that we now find ourselves in an energy crisis, with thousands of families faced with the choice of heating or eating.
You write that “concerns have persisted over the safety of nuclear power and the environmental impact of disposing of harmful waste”. Nuclear power is incredibly safe. How many people have died as a result of nuclear power plants being built? And how many have died during the production of fossil fuels; how many will die as the climate changes and great areas of our planet become uninhabitable or unproductive as we burn those fuels?
I’ve never understood the safety concerns about nuclear power and wonder if they come from confusion between civil nuclear power generation and the spectacular and terrifying power of nuclear weapons. Same basic science, very different technologies. The Japanese nuclear plant at Fukushima was destroyed by a huge earthquake and a tsunami; it didn’t explode.
As for fears about radiation from spent nuclear fuel, they too have been exaggerated. Small amounts of radiation are a normal part of our environment and, if you live in the likes of Aberdeen with chunks of granite around, you’re likely to get more than the UK average dose. But I don’t hear anyone calling for the evacuation of Aberdeen; not yet, anyway.
You report that the Scottish Government’s vision statement refers to “increasing interest in the development of new nuclear technologies”. I assume it means nuclear fusion, which involves bringing together atoms of isotopes of hydrogen, rather than fission, which involves splitting large atoms, usually uranium. Nuclear fusion produces less radiation than fission but, if the Government thinks it’s going to ride over the horizon and solve our energy crisis, I suggest it thinks again: the technology was just over the horizon when I was at university, and that was 50 years ago.
It's time for Holyrood to stop issuing vacuous vision statements and get on with resolving the current problems with our energy supply, problems that are at least in part of its own making.
Doug Maughan, Dunblane.
* ONCE again we learn of the lack of foresight shown by the Scottish Government. With the closure of Hunterston B, it is likely that Scotland will have to import more energy from elsewhere in the UK when adequate supply from wind power is not available. Scotland now has only one nuclear power station at Torness, which is understood to be closing in 2028. Questions are being asked about the capability of Scotland to attain its targets for reduction in emissions when the time comes when there is no nuclear power available here. Moreover, as matters stand, there must be concern for the security of supply in Scotland when Torness comes to the end of its operational life.
The Westminster Government and Rolls-Royce are investing in research into small modular reactors. The Scottish Government is currently awaiting developments with regard to "new nuclear technologies" and remains resistant to any new nuclear stations applying current technologies being considered. Let us hope that in its updated energy strategy soon to be published, the Scottish Government will make clear its position with regard to the situation after the closure of Torness and the effects of that both on security of supply in Scotland and on the estimated costs of supply to customers.
Ian W Thomson, Lenzie.
I WAS A PIONEER OF PENICILLIN
CHRISTOPHER W Ide (Letters, February 16) says that the discovery of penicillin prevented much disability and this point certainly resonated with me. As a young child in 1947/48 I was diagnosed with osteomyelitis, a painful disease of the bone, in my leg. I was treated in the Victoria Hospital in Glasgow with four daily injections of penicillin, and discharged, cured, two weeks later.
Later on that year my parents were asked to bring me to a lecture (to students I presume) to be used to demonstrate the curative effects of the new wonder drug. Also in the anteroom where we waited there was a young woman who had been suffering from osteomyelitis for many years and had undergone many painful procedures for what was now in her case a chronic disease. She still at that time had an open wound on her leg. She was the “pre-penicillin” patient and I one of the first of the “post-penicillin" ones.
As a child my main memory is of the lecturer asking me to demonstrate my fitness by running to the back of the room. As I reached the back I slipped and fell – much to my embarrassment, and the amusement of the audience.
Marie Methley, Kirkintilloch.
ANDREW'S LACK OF DRESS SENSE
YOU carry a photograph of Prince Andrew in the dress uniform of the Grenadier Guards ("Queen ‘may have to help fund Andrew’s sex case settlement", The Herald, February 17).
Someone pretending to be something they are not entitled to is often referred to in the Royal Marines as a Walt, as in Walter Mitty. This could for example be applied to someone wearing a badge on the left sleeve that indicates he has passed the Commando Course when in fact he hasn't.
Perhaps someone in the chain of-command might draw this to the attention of Prince Andrew.
Tom Pitt, Glasgow.
SPECIAL MEMORIES
I WAS intrigued to spot a familiar face from many years ago in your Remember when... feature today, that of Harry Towb ("Over the Bridge at the King’s", The Herald, February 17). Of course, he did not come to Scotland just to appear in a play. He would appear several times a day, every day of the week, in a celebrated TV advert, which ran something along the following lines: "Why do I come to Scotland? Because your beer is good; your Tartan Special is good."
George F Campbell, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel