The fight to save the controversial Western Isles wind farm project is to be taken to Europe.
Officials and politicians in Brussels will be told this week that it is their environmental directives which are preventing the area from helping reach the renewable energy targets that Europe seeks.
Western Isles Council is set to outline the case for windpower in the Western Isles as the European Union launches its Sustainable Energy Week.
Council vice-convener Angus Campbell, a key speaker at the event in Brussels, will highlight the need for renewable energy schemes such as the Lewis Wind Power proposal for 181 turbines in the north and west of the island to be given the go-ahead if global warming targets are to be met.
On Friday, developers Lewis Wind Power received a letter from the Scottish Government indicating the project was unlikely to win ministerial approval. Ministers are concerned at the impact the huge development would have on the 164,000-acre Lewis Peatlands Special Protection Area which was classified under EU directives. The area qualified by supporting bird populations of European importance.
Mr Campbell said: "In Brussels I will argue that European designations were never supposed to stop all development in rural and sparsely populated island communities, although that is precisely what seems to be happening."
Representatives of the council yesterday met Jim Mather, the Energy Minister, to discuss the economic situation in the Western Isles.
Mr Campbell said: "The minister listened to what we had to say about the socio-economic challenges that the islands face. It was a constructive meeting and paves the way for continued dialogue."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article