The passport records of all three US presidential candidates have been accessed without authorisation. It is not yet known whether these breaches of privacy were politically motivated or the result of simple curiosity on the part of employees at the US State Department.
Apologising to Senator Barack Obama, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that she would be disturbed if she learned that someone had looked into her passport file. Meanwhile, Democrat spokesmen have highlighted the potential security risks. I fear that, were such a thing to be discovered here, ministers would not be so sensitive to the issues involved.
Meg Hillier, Minister for ID cards, routinely dismisses concerns about the National Identity Register by pretending that it is comparable to the existing passport database and suggesting that no-one is worried about the data stored on that. The complacency of successive Home Office ministers is itself deeply disturbing.
Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights has just reported that data protection is not taken sufficiently seriously by government and highlighted in particular its lack of confidence about the security of data on a National Identity Register.
The only way to ensure data remains secure is to keep it private. That means not collecting and collating unnecessary personal data on vast government databases.
Geraint Bevan, NO2ID Scotland, 3e Grovepark Gardens, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article