The battle to overturn Edinburgh’s ban on strip clubs has reached the courts, with a judge set to decide if the nil-cap policy is legal.
A union representing exotic dancers and the clubs set to be banned made their cases against the City of Edinburgh Council’s vote earlier this year to set the maximum number of sexual entertainment venues at zero.
Aidan O’Neill KC made the case against the policy on behalf of the city’s strip clubs to Lord Richardson, while David Welsh argued on behalf of the United Sex Workers union (USW) against the cap.
READ MORE: Stirling pub near Robert the Bruce Borestone site for sale
Mr Welsh told the hearing that the policy would impede their human rights, and that affidavits from dancers in the city told how the ban would see them struggle to pay their rents, push them into debt, and break up with their partners because they have to move city to work.
Of the nil-cap policy, he said: “If you want to stay in Edinburgh, you have to do another job.
“If you want to do the the job you have chosen to do, and works for your lifestyle and circumstances, you have to work somewhere else.”
Both Mr O’Neill, representing clubs including Burke and Hare and Diamond Dolls, and Mr Welsh highlighted previous cases as part of their arguments against the policy.
The two-day hearing continues on Friday, when Christine O’Neill is expected to put the arguments of the capital’s city council to the court.
Earlier this year, USW raised money to fund the judicial review against the decision of councillors in March.
The decision, made by the city’s regulatory committee on March 31, was a knife-edge five to four vote in favour of setting the cap at zero.
Councillors had the option of setting the cap at four, keeping all the clubs open, but this was rejected.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel