What is it?
A pair of bone-conducting headphones designed for outdoor activities.
Good points?
Sitting on cheekbones in front of the ears allows the wearer to hear ambient noise which is much safer than buds or bulky pads that cover the ear canal. This position is also more comfortable as it removes pressure fatigue associated with traditional headphones.
They are also very lightweight and have a secure fit, so you don't have to worry about them falling out or shifting while you're active.
The Haylou wireless bone-conducting headphones also have a long battery life and come with a charging case that can provide multiple charges throughout the day.
Additionally, they are rated IP67 waterproof, which means they can withstand sweat and rain, making them perfect for sports and outdoor activities.
Audio quality is excellent providing a clear and balanced sound that is easy to listen to. They also have a built-in microphone, which works well for taking calls.
Controlling the audio functions is simple thanks to a large media button located on the left temple ridge. A single tap will play or pause while double and triple presses either skip or return to previous tracks.
The device is also equipped with Bluetooth 5.2 technology, which provides a stable and fast connection for dual devices with low latency that eliminates frustrating dropouts.
Bad points?
The charging cable is short which can make it awkward to place down.
Best for ...
Anyone looking for a safe and innovative way to listen to music, podcasts and take calls on the go.
Avoid if ...
You would rather sacrifice safety for sound quality.
Score: 9/10.
Haylou PurFree BC01 Headphones, £99.99 (amazon.co.uk)
Haylou HERE
Amazon HERE
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here