A former Glasgow Warriors winger has avoided jail over the domestic abuse of an ex-partner.
Rufus McLean, 23, was sentenced to 120 hours of community service at Edinburgh Sheriff Court after he pled guilty to the charges last year.
The rugby player was also given a 10-year Non-Harassment Order forbidding him from contacting and approaching Cara Haston.
The winger admitted guilt to charges under section 1 of the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act.
McLean used tracking systems on his partner’s phone and demanded passwords to her social media accounts during his period of abusive control.
He also left the 21-year-old victim with a burst lip and a black eye after pushing her off him.
Sentencing McLean, Sheriff Matthew Auchincloss said that the “threshold” for a jail sentence was passed but as a first offender sentenced on a summary complaint the player “cannot be sent to prison unless the court considers that no other method of dealing with you is appropriate”.
READ MORE: Rufus McLean suspended by Glasgow after guilty plea
The victim's family described additional verbal abuse she has endured from “members of the rugby community”.
“Cara's life has stood still, and so has that of our family,” a statement read.
“Unbelievably, Cara has had to endure continued verbal abuse from members of the rugby community.
“She is the victim, yet it seems that there still remain some young players who do not understand that when a defendant pleads guilty, it is an admission of wrong doing.
“In the case of Rufus McLean, it means serious abuse of a woman, verbally or otherwise, is totally unacceptable and deserves an appropriate response.”
The family added that the knowledge that their daughter suffered a 20-month-long campaign of abuse “at the hands of the defendant is heart-breaking”
McLean pleaded guilty in December last year to behaving in an “emotionally abusive and controlling" manner between April 2019 and January 2021.
READ MORE: SNP president fears leadership secrecy row will 'aid our enemies'
On sentencing, Sheriff Auchincloss said their was no doubt that the man’s behaviour “caused significant harm” to his former partner.
He said: “Your behaviour included shouting and swearing, aggressive behaviour with elements of physical contact, as well as behaviour of a controlling type.
“In assessing your culpability I accept that you may not have intended to cause harm.
“However, given the extended time period and nature of the behaviour it is clear that you were reckless as to whether harm would be caused and you should have known that there was a risk of harm from your behaviour.”
The Sheriff added: “You have shown remorse and shame for your behaviour. You fully recognise the hurt and fear your behaviour has caused your ex-partner. In these circumstances I consider that there is an appropriate alternative to a custodial sentence.”
The winger would have been given 200 hours were it not for his age and early plea, the sheriff explained.
He was suspended and later sacked by Glasgow Warriors after he pled guilty over "gross misconduct and breach of contract".
The family of the victim raised questions for Scottish Rugby in their statement.
They wrote: “Why was it that after Rufus McLean pleaded guilty to Domestic Abuse (18 months after he was charged), eight days later remaining on Glasgow Warriors publicity material for the second leg of the 1872 Cup match against Edinburgh.
“It was only after prolonged media attention that they were forced to respond to the seriousness of the situation.
“We hope that a more stringent procedure is now in place so no other family or young woman has to suffer in this way.”
A Scottish Rugby spokesperson said: “Scottish Rugby in no way condones abuse of any kind, in whatever form that takes. We have been proactively working in recent years with Police Scotland and other partners to ensure our own people and players are aware of the negative impact abusive behaviour can have on individuals and their families.
“We are sad to hear of the distress Cara and her family have suffered and we hope that today’s sentencing allows all parties to move forward from what have been clearly difficult and upsetting circumstances.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here