A few weeks ago we heard news reports that energy companies were breaking into the homes of vulnerable people and forcibly installing prepayment meters (PPMs).
We at Citizens Advice Scotland (CAS) were already aware of this and shared the widespread sense of outrage that followed the news revelations. For this practice to happen at any time would be appalling. For it to happen at the coldest time of year during an unprecedented cost of living crisis was unthinkable.
That sense of outrage compelled the energy regulator Ofgem to impose a moratorium on forced installations. A national call for evidence is under way, and Ofgem will then decide what is to happen next.
Across our own network, we know that one in four people seeking CAB advice with PPMs also requires food bank advice. Behind that statistic are thousands of people across Scotland trapped in a perpetual cycle of debt and unable to meet their essential bills.
I was speaking to colleagues in our Extra Help Unit recently who told me that, for some PPM customers, energy is a luxury they can only afford in the first week or two of the month, and they then go without until the next payday.
That’s unsustainable and unacceptable – but it’s an inescapable reality for many just now, and more people will be exposed to that risk without sufficient protections.
We have been robust in our condemnation of mandatory PPMs, and we are equally clear about what needs to happen to protect consumers going forward.
First and foremost, this practice must stop for good. We see so many complex problems across our network – but this one has a really simple and straightforward solution: we need a permanent and outright ban on mandatory PPMs.
Second, suppliers who forcibly installed or remote-switched PPMs without the full and informed consent should be required to reverse that action, and recompense consumers.
Whether you physically install a PPM in someone’s home, or flick a switch remotely, the outcome is the same. People – often older, or with health conditions, or families with young children – are moved from a situation where energy costs can be smoothed out over time, to a situation where the costs must be met upfront.
Many people just don’t have that income upfront and available. That means no heating; it means no lighting; it means the fridge goes off; your food goes off.
But it’s not just that. It’s the humiliation, the loss of control. Anyone who has ever been burgled knows that items stolen or damaged is just one part of the distress you feel. The other is the sense of violation. The thought of people – strangers – walking around in your home without your invitation. It’s deeply unsettling, an invasion of your place of privacy and comfort.
Energy companies might feel they had the right to do this under the previous rules, but to the person or family affected, it’s still a form of breaking and entering.
By the time the Ofgem call for evidence closes next month, the traumatic media images of people kicking down doors and forcibly fitting PPMs may feel like a long time ago.
But my plea is that we don’t forget our initial reaction. CAS will certainly use our evidence to make the case for change. We must ensure that this disgraceful practice is never allowed to happen again.
David Hilferty is the policy lead for Social Justice at Citizens Advice Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here