A rebel MP who branded the SNP “utterly clueless” over its independence strategy is facing expulsion at a hearing this week that his allies have reportedly called a “kangaroo court”.
Angus Brendan MacNeil was due to appear in front of the SNP's conduct committee after having been suspended after a bust-up with the party’s chief whip in the House of Commons voting lobby.
It had been reported that the meeting was to take place today. But it is now understood it will be tomorrow. The MP is not expected to attend.
The MP for Na h-Eileanan an Iar had the whip removed for a week after the public row with Brendan O’Hara and was then suspended after refusing to rejoin the party’s Westminster group.
While Mr MacNeil, who has been an MP since 2005, risks losing his party membership of 30 years if the committee finds against him, it is not yet known whether he has any intention of remaining in the SNP.
READ MORE: Flynn steps up attack on Labour as he hits byelection trail
A close colleague told the Times last weekend: “Rather than take action against MacNeil, they would be better employed focusing on campaigning for independence. Any action against him will only make matters worse for the SNP in winning support.”
The source added that Michael Russell, the SNP president, had prejudiced the case against MacNeil.
Mr Russell criticised Mr MacNeil in a recent article in The National. He wrote: “I utterly disagree with Angus Brendan MacNeil’s analysis and actions this past week.
“Attacking your fellow party members, holding a gun to their head about some action that you want the entire membership to take no matter their own views and parading contempt for your colleagues as a ‘clueless’ leadership will not bring us an inch nearer independence.
“Instead, it gives our enemies — the word is far from inappropriate these days — a perfect opportunity to pile on the venomous attacks, quoting MacNeil with glee and that is just what they have done. Given the times we are in, it will in fact give Labour seats at Westminster whilst letting the Tories off the hook at Holyrood.”
Mr MacNeil’s friends told the paper that the party president’s intervention would influence officials to prejudge the case.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes calls for SNP conference debate on agreement with Greens
The MP has been an outspoken critic of the SNP leadership. He claimed that it had been playing “tricks” on members for years and continually “kicking the can down the road”.
Whatever the outcome of the hearing, Mr MacNeil is unlikely to contest the general election as an SNP candidate.
He has pledged to stand again regardless of his party affiliation but has denied that he intends to join Alex Salmond’s Alba Party.
Standing as an independent for his present seat risks splitting the independence vote.
Scottish Labour is already mounting a strong challenge in the Western Isles, and has selected a well known figure as their candidate in the islands — Torcuil Crichton, the former Daily Record Westminster editor.
Mr MacNeil has said that he would sit as an independent MP until at least October.
He is one the longest-serving SNP MPs; he was elected to parliament in 2005, and is chairman of the energy security and net zero committee.
The SNP said it was making no comment, although previously party sources insisted he was in clear breach of the party’s rules about making a public resignation.
Last month First Minister Humza Yousaf said it was not for Mr MacNeil to decide 'whether he rejoins the SNP group or not'. He added: "He was elected as an SNP MP by his constituents. To me, it is not acceptable that he decides not to join the SNP group.'
Mr Yousaf said a decision is also likely after summer about whether MSP Fergus Ewing will have the whip removed for voting with opponents.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel