PARENTS are concerned about the potentially damaging impact of the reintroduction of standardised national tests in schools across Scotland.
An online survey of members of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council (SPTC) found more than 16 per cent disagreed with the policy while 50 per cent were uncertain of the benefits.
However, 30 per cent were in favour of the Scottish Government plans to test pupils at key stages of primary school and again in secondary.
The Herald's View: Making national tests work for everyone
Crucially, for a majority of respondents the priority was that test results were shared between children, parents and teachers rather than with other schools, local authorities or at a national level.
Eileen Prior, SPTC’s executive director, said: “From the feedback we received, it seems parents’ greatest concern is the way data from the assessments would be used.
“In schools where standardised assessment is already used, participants rated their satisfaction at 2.4 out of 5 when asked about the way the information is shared.
“To us this indicates that gathering data does not solve the fundamental issue of how schools share good quality information with families in an effective way, and involve them in supporting their child’s learning.”
Ms Prior said many of the 265 parent council member who took part felt that making data available on a national basis would lead to schools feeling “pressure” to rise higher in league tables, rather than using it to identify support and next steps for individual pupils.
One parent commented: “A test score is self-limiting as it does not capture the strengths and achievements of pupils who do not test well.”
The move came after the biennial Scottish Survey of Literacy found standards of reading and writing were falling despite the introduction of the Curriculum for Excellence, which was expected to raise basic standards.
Although most councils use standardised tests the Scottish Government is concerned there is no national picture of how well different schools are performing.
Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland teaching union, said concerns of parents about the new tests were mirrored by teachers.
He said: “The SPTC survey confirms the view of the EIS that the potential misuse of assessment data to support league tables and inappropriate target setting is the greatest concern around standardised assessments.
“Parents and pupils are entitled to useful assessment feedback but it should be focused on improving learning not ticking political boxes.”
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We are developing the National Improvement Framework, which will support parents, teachers and policy-makers and provide a much clearer picture of what works best in improving educational outcomes for all.
"We listened carefully to the views of parents, children, teachers and other stakeholders throughout its development and the findings of this survey reinforces our approach.
“Our draft National Improvement Framework will build on a strong record of achievement, with the aim of ensuring we have the right information about children’s progress right across Scotland."
However, the policy took several years to implement and the majority of Scotland’s local authorities still use some form of standardised assessment to judge pupils’ progress. However, because they use different systems, building a national picture of attainment is difficult.
An Audit Scotland report from 2014 found there were no comparable measures available at a council and national level on the performance of pupils from P1-S3.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel