Environmental lawyers will argue plans to tackle air pollution are “flawed” as they bring a High Court challenge against the Government.
ClientEarth is bringing legal action against the UK and Welsh governments on Thursday in response to plans designed to clean up illegal levels of harmful nitrogen dioxide.
The charity, which has won two previous cases against ministers over failures to meet legal limits for the pollutant, says the latest proposals still fall short of what is needed.
Following court orders, ministers revealed plans for meeting European Union limits on the pollutant, much of which comes from vehicles, particularly those with diesel engines, in July after a long-running legal battle with the charity.
The Government’s air pollution plans include proposals to halt sales of new diesel and petrol cars by 2040 (PA)
The measures included £255 million to help local authorities come up with ways to improve air quality, from improving public transport and changing road layouts to charging zones for polluting vehicles.
Much of the focus was on proposals to end the sale of all conventional petrol and diesel cars by 2040, to help tackle air pollution and emissions.
The Government was ordered to produce the latest plans after ClientEarth’s successful case in 2016, when the courts ruled earlier proposals were not enough to meet EU pollution limits – which the UK has breached since the rules came into effect in 2010.
The charity’s latest claim for judicial review is on the grounds the latest plan rows back on an earlier commitment to order five cities to introduce clean air zones by 2020.
It is also challenging the lack of any requirements for action to bring down air pollution as quickly as possible in 45 English local authorities and in Wales.
Eight years after the original deadline, 37 out of 43 zones across the UK remain in breach of legal #airpollution limits. This is why we're going back to court tomorrow. Read the full story here: https://t.co/srqiFe8QtY pic.twitter.com/WohzOCuVQL
— ClientEarth (@ClientEarth) January 24, 2018
Chief executive James Thornton said: “The Government’s latest plan is flawed.
“Even now, eight years after the original deadline for compliance, 37 out of 43 zones across the UK remain in breach of legal air pollution limits.
“Clean air zones would discourage the most polluting vehicles from entering the most polluted areas, something which the Government’s own evidence showed was the most effective way of bringing down air pollution in the shortest time.”
The case is being brought against the Environment Secretary, the Transport Secretary and the Cabinet Secretary for Environment and Rural Affairs in the Welsh Government.
The Environment Department (Defra) previously said it could not comment on ongoing legal proceedings.
But a spokesman added: “We have put in place a £3 billion plan to improve air quality and reduce harmful emissions.
“We will also end the sale of new diesel and petrol cars by 2040 and next year we will publish a comprehensive clean air strategy which will set out further steps to tackle air pollution.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here