A 205 million year-old bone discovered in the UK belonged to a sea reptile approaching the size of a blue whale, according to experts.
The jaw bone, found on the beach at Lilstock in Somerset, has been identified as that of a giant ichthyosaur.
It could have measured up to 26m in length and be one of the largest ichthyosaurs ever known, according to a study published in journal PLOS ONE.
The largest reported ichthyosaurs – the shastasaurid – lived during the late Triassic period, around 200 to 235 million years ago, and ranged from 6m to more than 20m long.
Paul de la Salle, a fossil collector and co-author of the study, discovered the jaw bone in May 2016.
“Initially the bone just looked like a piece of rock but, after recognising a groove and bone structure, I thought it might be part of a jaw from an ichthyosaur,” he said.
He later returned and found more pieces measuring around one metre in length.
The specimen was identified as an incomplete bone, known as a surangular, from the lower jaw of an ichthyosaur by experts Dean Lomax, of the University of Manchester, and Professor Judy Massare of Brockport College, New York.
They found similarities with the shastasaurid Shonisaurus sikanniensis, the largest known ichthyosaur at 21m long, indicating the bone belonged to a similar species.
Mr Lomax said: “As the specimen is represented only by a large piece of jaw, it is difficult to provide a size estimate, but by using a simple scaling factor and comparing the same bone in Shonisaurus sikanniensis, the Lilstock specimen is about 25% larger.
“Other comparisons suggest the Lilstock ichthyosaur was at least 20 to 25 metres.
“Of course, such estimates are not entirely realistic because of differences between species.
“Nonetheless, simple scaling is commonly used to estimate size, especially when comparative material is scarce.”
The finding shows the giant ichthyosaur lived close to the point of the late Triassic extinction event and has prompted a reinterpretation of large 208 million year-old bones found in Aust Cliff, Gloucestershire, in 1850, the researchers said.
They were previously thought to belong to dinosaurs but the authors said they could also be from a giant ichthyosaur, even bigger than the specimen found in Lilstock.
Mr Lomax said: “One of the Aust bones might also be an ichthyosaur surangular.
“If it is, by comparison with the Lilstock specimen, it might represent a much larger animal.
“To verify these findings, we need a complete giant Triassic ichthyosaur from the UK – a lot easier said than done.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here