The “unprecedented and very serious” court case backlog poses the greatest threat to the criminal justice system in England and Wales, watchdogs have warned.
Four top inspectors have joined forces to express their “grave concerns” about the situation, which has been exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic.
Justin Russell, chief inspector of probation, Sir Thomas Winsor, chief inspector of constabulary, Charlie Taylor, chief inspector of prisons, and Kevin McGinty, chief inspector of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), issued the warning on Tuesday ahead of being questioned by MPs on the matter.
In a joint report, they spelt out how the coronavirus pandemic has affected the work of police, prosecutors, prisons, probation and youth offending teams.
They concluded that the “unprecedented and very serious court backlogs constitute the greatest risk to criminal justice and the ripple effects across all agencies are profound”.
They pointed to the difficulties and lengthy delays at all stages of the criminal justice system that “benefit no-one and risk damage to many”.
Although they praised the commitment of staff and highlighted efforts to continue working amid the crisis, particularly remotely, many areas of concern were raised.
According to the report, the number of ongoing cases in crown courts was 44% higher in December compared with February last year, while some cases are already being scheduled for 2022.
The criminal courts backlog stood at 457,518 as of November, the latest available figures from the Ministry of Justice show.
There were 53,950 cases outstanding in the crown courts and 403,568 outstanding in the magistrates’ courts.
According to the data, the overall number of outstanding criminal cases has fallen slightly since October.
But it is still about 100,000 higher than figures for February 2020, before the country first went into lockdown in March.
The report comes as the Bar Council, which represents around 17,000 barristers, called for a cash injection of an extra £55 million to improve courts and increase capacity for hearings in a bid to cut the backlog.
Speaking on behalf of all four inspectorates, Mr Russell said: “Delays mean victims must wait longer for cases to be heard; some will withdraw support for prosecutions because they have lost faith in the process.
“Witnesses will find it difficult to recall events that took place many months ago, and prosecutors waste significant periods of time preparing for cases that do not go ahead.”
He said those accused of crimes also face delays in their opportunities to defend themselves, are being kept longer on remand, while prisoners continue to experience a “highly restrictive prison regime or experience delays in accessing rehabilitation programmes and support through probation services”.
He said court backlogs are having a “ripple effect” across all criminal justice agencies and “must be dealt with to ensure fair justice for victims and perpetrators of crime”, adding: “This is a whole-system problem that requires a whole-system solution.”
Diana Fawcett, Victim Support’s chief executive, warned it could take “years” for the system to recover, and said the charity is “incredibly concerned that thousands of victims will fall through the gaps”.
She added: “The Government must take drastic action to address the backlog in cases and the serious consequences of court delays.”
Law Society of England and Wales president David Greene described the situation in the criminal justice system as “critical” as he reiterated calls for more steps to be taken to make courts safer for those still having to attend cases in person, adding: “The gains sought to be achieved in pressing on regardless will be lost if such measures are not put in place.”
The Government said it was investing £450 million to “boost recovery in the courts and deliver swifter justice”, insisting this was “already yielding results”.
The CPS said safely reducing the backlog was “vital” to ease pressure on prosecutors, adding: “We are working urgently with partners to achieve this.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article