Water companies have asked to increase consumer bills by even more than they originally requested, according to figures released by watchdog Ofwat on Tuesday.
The latest requests by water firms would see the average consumer bill in England and Wales rise by 40% between now and 2030, costing £615 per year.
Earlier this year, companies asked Ofwat for bills averaging £585 by 2030, an increase of about one-third from the current average of £439.
This summer, the regulator pared back those requests to an average of £535, in its draft price review in July.
But now, after a consultation period, 10 of the 11 water companies have hit back with even higher requests than before.
Many argue that they need to spend more on upgrading their pipes, sewers and reservoirs than originally planned, and therefore need bills to go up too.
Ofwat wrote in an update on Tuesday that this is “mostly to meet the requirements of other regulators like the Environment Agency and Drinking Water Inspectorate”.
But some of the increases are designed to meet “changes to the proposed rate of return for investors”.
Ofwat is due to make a final decision on bills increases on December 19, with companies going to the negotiating table with regulators before then.
The watchdog wrote: “We will consider this additional expenditure request as part of our final determinations.”
The latest string of demands come amid public and political outcry over sewage spills in the privatised water industry, while companies’ investors receive dividends and top executives get bonuses.
A recent performance report by Ofwat showed there has only been a 2% reduction in pollution since 2019 despite firms committing to cutting it by 30%.
Labour has suggested sweeping new laws which could see bosses face up to two years in jail if they obstruct regulators – but so far nothing has come into force.
The biggest proposed rise is by Southern Water, which would see bills for its customers in Sussex, Kent and Hampshire rise by 84% between now and 2030.
Thames Water, the UK’s biggest provider, which is in emergency talks over a £15 billion debt pile and a worsening financial situation, has asked for a 53% rise.
The next biggest increases requested are by Severn Trent Water, of 46% to £580, and North Wales provider Hafren Dyfrdwy, of 45% to £568.
Only one company, Wessex Water, is not demanding higher bills than first requested.
Downing Street said no-one wants to see water bills rising and the Government will work to ensure “money goes where it’s needed”.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “Clearly no one wanted to see a situation where water bills are rising, where the water sector has got into the situation that it has with record levels of sewage spills and ageing infrastructure.
“That’s why when this Government came in they set out a raft of measures to drive change in the industry, clean up our waterways, including the new Water Bill.”
He added: “Ofwat are the independent regulator and will make their final determination in December.
“From the Government’s perspective, our priority is making sure that money goes where it’s needed and ensuring that water companies are putting customers first. If money isn’t spent, it will be returned to customers.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here