New evidence has emerged that suggests airborne transmission of the coronavirus has been underestimated.
So far, the World Health Organization (WHO) has said the virus is transmitted via droplets that are released when people cough or sneeze - but fresh information on the virus has shed new light on Covid-19.
Can coronavirus be transmitted in the air?
In an open letter from more than 200 scientists, published in the journal - Clinical Infectious Diseases on Monday (July 6) - the WHO has been accused of underestimating the possibility that coronavirus can be spread by tiny particles in the air.
Scientists have suggested that airborne transmission cannot be ruled out in crowded, closed or poorly ventilated settings.
The WHO has previously insisted that coronavirus is only transmitted via droplets that are emitted from coughs or sneezes.
Such droplets do not linger in the air, but rather fall onto surfaces, and as such, handwashing has been identified as a key preventative measure.
However, 239 scientists from 32 countries have disagreed with such claims, saying there is strong evidence that suggests the virus can also be spread in the air.
It has been claimed that it could be transmitted through much smaller particles released when people talk and breathe out float around in the air for several hours after.
What did the WHO say?
In response to the claims, the WHO updated its guidance on the transmission of coronavirus on Thursday (July 9), acknowledging the possibility of airborne transmission.
The WHO admitted that there was scientific evidence to suggest that airborne transmission was possible in certain settings, such as enclosed and crowded spaces, but cautioned that such evidence is preliminary, and requires further assessment.
Benedetta Allegranzi, the WHO's technical lead for infection prevention and control, said that evidence emerging of airborne transmission of the coronavirus in "crowded, closed, poorly ventilated settings that have been described, cannot be ruled out".
Commenting on the WHO’s response, Jose Jimenez, a chemist at the University of Colorado who signed the letter, told Reuters: “This is a move in the right direction, albeit a small one.
“It is becoming clear that the pandemic is driven by super-spreading events, and that the best explanation for many of those events is aerosol transmission.”
What does it mean for current rules?
Following its review of scientific evidence, the WHO said that coronavirus spreads through contact with contaminated surfaces, or by close contact with people infected with the virus.
It said transmission occurs through saliva or respiratory droplets that are released when an infected person coughs, sneezes, speaks or sings.
As such, guidance states that people should avoid crowds, ensure good ventilation in buildings, observe social distancing, and make use of masks when physical distancing is not possible.
If evidence of airborne transmission is confirmed, the current guidance on preventing the spread of the virus may be forced to change.
In this case, it could result in more widespread use of masks and more stringent rules on social distancing, particularly in higher-risk areas, such as public transport, pubs, bars and restaurants.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article