Stansted Airport passengers complained of waiting more than two hours to receive their baggage in the early hours of Tuesday morning.
The problem emerged when around 30 delayed flights landed at the Essex airport between midnight and 3am amid poor visibility.
Oliver Williams, from London, described the airport as an “absolute shambles”.
He said: “All staff have disappeared, hundreds of passengers awaiting baggage for hours and no water available.”
Passengers were also frustrated by long queues at passport control.
Charley Allen, from Exeter, wrote on Twitter: “What’s happening with passport control? 3am, thousands of people and all e-passport gates closed?”
An airport spokesman said all baggage was returned by around 4am and the airport has returned to normal operation.
Flights were delayed after air traffic controllers doubled the minimum distance between incoming aircraft due to fog.
A spokesman for Ryanair said: “Following earlier weather delays on flights arriving into London Stansted, a number of aircraft landed outside of scheduled operating hours, which resulted in some handling delays.
“We sincerely apologise to affected customers and have asked our handling agent at Stansted, Swissport, to take the necessary steps to ensure this does not recur.”
An airport spokesman said: “Airlines and ground handling partners called in additional staff to help manage the situation and mitigate delays. Our own staff helped provide passengers with information and handed out water during the period.
“On behalf of our airlines, handling agents and the airport we apologise for the delays and inconvenience caused to passengers.”
Stansted is the UK’s fourth busiest airport, with 26 million passengers last year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel