SCOTTISH Education Secretary Mike Russell recently described his controversial teachers' pay agreement with local authorities and the main teaching union as "not the best deal for everybody".
Surely that was an understatement. Under its terms, there were safeguards for newly-qualified teachers and an allowance for smaller class sizes but the quid pro quo was the imposition of the lowest hourly rate paid to supply teachers working for less than five consecutive days in the same school. The effect on many staff who fill in for illness or absence was to nearly halve their pay. In The Herald today, one of them complains they are treated like casual day labourers in the Third World. Now they have had enough.
All schools are sometimes dependent on supply teachers during pressure points, such as flu outbreaks or when permanent staff are undergoing training. Teachers are human. They fall ill and suffer bereavements, just like the rest of us. So the quality and commitment of supply teachers, and the day to day continuity they offer, can have an enormous impact on the prospects of children and young people.
Supply teachers are outraged with the EIS, local authorities and the Scottish Government and are now threatening to withhold their services for a week in the hope of forcing a rethink. They are justified in feeling they have been singled out for harsh treatment.
Under the new system, there is nothing to stop cash-strapped local authorities from employing a supply teacher for four days, then bringing in someone else for the fifth day, so as to avoid triggering a higher payment. They can even move the same supply teachers between different schools, as the "continuous" clause only applies to individual schools.
Unsurprisingly, there is now a shortage of supply teachers, especially outwith the Central Belt and in certain subjects because many experienced teachers are not prepared to work for less. As a result classes have to double up and there are even reports of pupils left in the care of unqualified staff. Anecdotal evidence suggests some teachers are leaving the profession or considering a downgrade to teaching assistant posts in their search for regular work. Others are taking posts in England or abroad.
The education of pupils faced with a succession of different supply teachers is bound to suffer. Parents of such pupils would be right to complain. The system is also unfair on supply teachers, some of whom were attracted into teaching from other professions by assurances that it offered a rewarding and stable career but who failed to land a permanent post after their probationary year. Retired senior teachers, who once upon a time were happy to fill in for a day or two a week, no longer find it worth their while.
This was a bad deal that affected those teachers least able to fight back. Councils are legally obliged to balance their books, while coping with pressure from the Scottish Government to reduce class sizes in lower primary, as well as maintaining the moratorium on the closure of rural schools. In a period of austerity, perhaps it is time for the minister to reconsider before the supply teacher shortage morphs into a crisis. Teachers like to tell their pupils that hard work brings rewards. Perhaps they might add, "unless you become a supply teacher".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article