The country needs to wake up to the fact that our wild places are at serious risk of being lost to the encroachment of wind farms ("Wind farm may cut power production bill by £45bn", The Herald, June 7).
The recent announcement by planners that Highland Council should accept the proposal to extend a wind farm at Loch Luichart near Garve is a worrying development and perhaps the first sign that no part of Scotland is immune from such vandalism.
No-one is denying that wind energy is a vital factor in Scotland's renewable energy policy but there has to be a point at which common sense is applied to just how many wind farms this small country can sustain without tarnishing its remarkable landscape.
A recent walk to the summit of Ben Cleuch illustrated just what an impact these turbines have on a once unspoilt vista. But this is just about palatable because one is in the Central Belt and the impact of man is already all too apparent.
The north-west Highlands are one of the last great wildernesses in western Europe but that tag will soon no longer be applicable if similar wind farms are allowed to spring up in places such as Garve.
What next? Torridon, Fisherfield? Their very remoteness is perhaps the thing that puts them at risk.
If there is no-one around to see them then no-one will mind?
That simply cannot be allowed to be the argument.
We love and visit these places because of their wildness, because of the fact that the hand of man is not so visible among all that natural wonder.
And if we change these places for the sake of a few extra megawatts of electricity, we will lose them, and I feel that we will lose something of ourselves as Scots.
John Nish,
42 Alma Street,
Falkirk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article