YET another wind farm at Glenchamber, Glenluce, has been allowed at appeal by the Scottish Government in spite of the democratically elected council's decision to refuse ("RES wins windfarm appeal", The Herald, August 1).
In her Decision Notice the Reporter cited the terms of National Planning Framework 2 and Scottish Planning Policy which "confirm the Scottish Government's strong support for renewable energy development ... contributing to more secure and diverse energy supplies, and supporting sustainable economic growth" and ruled that the Scottish Government's targets to generate by renewable means took precedence over all other material considerations. This is a recurrent theme to which there seems to be no answer.
Almost £16 million has been paid to Scottish windfarms to shut down when there is high wind output and low demand. There is not enough capacity on the cross-border interconnector to accommodate it, and wind energy has to be constrained off at ransom prices to preserve grid stability. An unknown additional sum has also been paid under "commercially confidential" agreements for the same purpose.
It is perverse that, given the Government's aims wind farms continue to be consented when the distribution system cannot deal with the present output.
The Scottish Government has aspirations for generation by renewables of the equivalent of Scotland's electricity demand by 2020, for sale to England (or perhaps Europe or Scandinavia) but no plans. The market research to identify customers has not even been done. The funding and construction of the infrastructure in England to enable distribution of Scotland's excess wind energy is not even in the power or purse of Holyrood, yet we still allow more and more windfarms through.
The people of Scotland will not forgive this Government when the full extent becomes known of the damage caused by these reckless aspirations to our way of life, our health, our prosperity, and our beautiful land.
Stuart Young,
Dunmore, Westside, Dunnet.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article