OFFICIAL figures have revealed a catastrophic decline in Scottish tourism last year with tourist spending down by £50m ("Olympics put a dampener on Scots tourism industry", The Herald, January 11.
VisitScotland chairman Mike Cantlay has blamed the poor weather. Since when do tourists come to Scotland for the weather?
This is the same tourism chief who claimed a few weeks ago that giant industrial wind turbines which now scar some of our most beautiful hills and glens are not a deterrent to tourists. He said there was even anecdotal evidence that wind turbines might attract visitors to Scotland. Well, now we have the answer.
Scotland's unique selling points are its world-renowned landscapes and seascapes, which the SNP Government is determined to industrialise. Already, more than 1700 giant industrial wind turbines have been erected across 142 operational wind farms in Scotland. With 37 more wind farms currently under construction, 123 consented and a massive 165 further developments submitted for planning, thousands more will be built to meet Alex Salmond's ludicrous target of the equivalent of 100% of our electricity from renewables by 2020.
Wind turbines are costly, useless and force us to rely on back-up supplies of coal and gas. They don't make any significant impact on CO2 emissions, but they do make a massive impact on energy bills. Already more than one-third of all households in Scotland have been driven into fuel poverty, faced each winter with the awful decision on whether to spend their money on food or fuel.
Now Scotland's tourist sector is paying the price for this misguided and ruinous energy policy and the best VisitScotland can come up with is to blame the weather.
Struan Stevenson,
MEP (Conservative),
The European Parliament,
Rue Wiertz, Brussels.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article