I refer to your article about the teaching of modern languages in Scottish schools ("Languages class target unachievable", The Herald, February 21).
The debate has gone on for some time now as to what is the best method to teach children modern languages and at what age to start.
Why is it that the relevant people do not look at other European countries and see how they do it? The problem with the teaching of modern languages in primary schools is that the teachers are not qualified language teachers with a background of university education and also, most importantly, experience of living in a foreign country for some time and knowing about the culture.
The question of teaching modern languages in schools does not seem to have been thought through – it is just a mish-mash of ideas. Pupils must learn the basics of the English language first before embarking on learning a foreign language.
I have experience working in central Europe and am a fluent German speaker, having studied it at university and taught German and French in secondary schools.
Elizabeth Anderson,
55 Kingston Road,
Bishopton, Renfrewshire.
The decline in the number of pupils studying foreign languages is very worrying and any measure that will help to halt this is to be applauded.
For the past two years the Rotary Club of Barrhead has presented Young Linguist of the Year awards in the two secondary schools in the area.
The competition is open to pupils in their fourth year and they have to present a job application in a foreign language which they are studying. The winners attend a meeting of the club where they read their work in the presence of the members.
This competition has been warmly welcomed by staff and pupils and has helped to increase interest in the subject.
In its small way it helps to promote the relevance of languages in social and commercial contexts and is in keeping with the international aspect of Rotary.
Rev Alexander Macdonald,
35 Lochore Avenue,
Paisley.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article