SCOTTISH and Southern Energy (SSE) claims its proposed wind farm development at Stronelairg above Fort Augustus wiill not impact on deep peat ("Council urged to oppose wild land turbines", The Herald, April 15).
However, the company admits in its environmental statement that a quarter of the site is on peat deeper than one and a half metres, with nearly a further quarter more than one metre. One metre is the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's definition of deep peat.
Indeed, the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) in its response to the application highlights the fact that the developer, SSE, does not actually know just how deep the peat on site is. When it surveyed the site, the longest probe it used could only reach two and a half metres into the ground.
SEPA highlights that the applicant has no reasonable ability to state that the layout and construction plan avoids impacts on deep peat, stating: "We consider that insufficient detail has been provided in relation to the minimisation of disturbance to peat throughout the whole [Stronelairg] project".
Research from the University of Leeds indicates that single drains can affect peat bogs across distances of 400m or more. When peat dries out it releases carbon. Despite this serious issue, the developer cited five metres as the distance from drains that peat would be affected by such drains in their application. This means the figures it puts forward in its Stronelairg Wind Farm Environmental Statement seriously underestimate the damage to this valuable wild area the development would cause.
SSE's claims that Stronelairg will not affect deep peat are dubious at best. Unless it provides sufficient further objective and verifiable evidence this is one more reason Government must throw out the Stronelairg development.
Fraser Wallace,
Policy officer,
John Muir Trust,
Tower House, Station Road,
Pitlochry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article