In the first of a new series of blogs, we explore whether it is possible to stay amicable during the painful process of divorce.
The Dilemma
My husband and I have agreed that our 12-year marriage is at an end. Although we haven’t had one almighty big bust up, we are fighting a lot, and it’s only going to get worse as we enter divorce proceedings. We own a house together, as well as the usual fixtures and fittings, and four years ago we bought a holiday home in Spain - I think we both thought that this might help us solve some of our problems. Although we don’t have kids, I’m very close to his family, especially his mother, and I’d like to maintain a relationship with her after we are divorced, so I want to try to be as amicable as possible. However, I also want to make sure I get my fair share of our joint investments. How can we get through a divorce without our extended family life falling apart due to our battles in court?
Divorce Doctor Gillian Crandles says:
It’s always sad when a marriage comes to an end, but thankfully there is a way of conducting proceedings that is designed to make the situation a bit less distressing.
A growing number of divorces are now being done via a process known as collaborative law, brought to the UK from America, and it’s a growing movement in Scotland. The cornerstone of the process is that the separating couple agree from the outset not to go to court, and seek to avoid as far as possible the emotional and financial damage that a divorce can involve.
Collaborative law is a way to avoid court, which can often be combative and cause what could have been an amicable negotiation to break down. You and your husband would both need to sign up to this route, which basically agrees that your divorce will be arranged through a series of face-to-face round the table meetings, as opposed to via the courts and the rolling exchange of lawyers letters - which can raise the temperature of divorce proceedings pretty quickly.
At these meetings, you would negotiate your divorce together with the help of any appropriate advisers, such as specially trained lawyers and financial advisers to help you agree the terms - including what happens to your joint investments. For example, an adviser with specific experience of selling property abroad could be useful for you. Counsellors can also become involved if you need them. Although you don’t have children, those that do can involve experts specifically to look after their needs too.
The responsibility to make decisions about your post-divorce lives would be retained by you and your husband, and not the court - hopefully this way you have a better chance of maintaining the relationships you value. At the end of the process, which usually involves perhaps three to four meetings, your divorce itself can be finalised on an agreed basis in your local Sheriff Court, and without the need for any court appearance.
Collaborative cases usually take a lot less time than traditional lawyer led negotiations, and certainly less than litigation, which can take years depending on the level of value of the case, the complexity of the issues involved and the animosity between the parties.
To start the collaborative law process, you need to contact a lawyer trained in this specialist area. The Scottish Collaborative Family Law Group provides a list of all of them at www.consensus-scotland.com
Gillian Crandles is a divorce and family law expert at Turcan Connell. She is trained in collaborative law and a member of the Scottish Collaborative Family Law Group.
If you have a dilemma or question you would like answered in the column, please send an email here. No names, email addresses or content which could identify the reader will be shared or used in the column.
You could also discuss your dilemma - or solutions - in our comments section below. Please note that if you want to post on the site, you must use your full name. Our posting rules are available here.
This column does not represent legal advice and as such neither its author, nor Turcan Connell, is liable for any consequences. Taking proper legal advice from a lawyer is always recommended.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article