IN the year when it enters the international stage like never before, it was the issue of the erosion of gay rights in Russia which prompted an unexpected foreign policy statement by Glasgow.
In her letter to the Mayor of Rostov-on-Don, a regional capital of more than one million souls, Glasgow's Lord Provost expressed hope that any city with which Glasgow had a relationship "would uphold people's human rights and treat them with dignity".
Sadie Docherty also offered to share with Rostov "our good experience of working to include lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered citizens as a valued part of our city".
Laudable in its intent, yes. But condescending correspondence to a counterpart with no say over national legislation, effectively a Russian version of the Section 28 laws in force in Scotland until 2000, is clumsy and undiplomatic.
First, as ghastly and homophobic as Russia's new gay propaganda laws may be, they result in fines and not the 14 years' imprisonment with corporal punishment handed down to those guilty of same-sex relations in Glasgow's African good cause, Malawi.
Closer to home a UK newspaper headlined on fears of same-sex promotion in schools, which would sit easily in Putin's Russia. Given the track record of its twin cities and their nations on human rights the bigger allegation Glasgow stands accused of is surely hypocrisy.
A quick point Mrs Docherty may have considered before penning her letter to Michael Chernyshev: Rostov has a thriving gay scene. Lahore, Glasgow's Pakistan twin, does not.
Nor does Bethlehem, another.
In Pakistan, the crime of same-sex relations can carry a sentence of life imprisonment. In the Palestinian Territories, LGBT protection is at best patchy. Many flee the West Bank to Israel citing discrimination but are then denied asylum because of the ongoing conflict.
Beyond sexuality, in the 12 years since twinning with Havana has there been any correspondence from Glasgow over the repression of virtually all forms of political dissent and the accompanying detentions, beatings, public acts of repudiation, travel restrictions, and forced exile?
A similar patronising and publicised letter to the civic leadership in these cities would not sit well with the those blinded to such abuses by their political correctness. And where do you start with the 16-year twinned relationship with the Chinese city of Dalian?
Of course Glasgow has benefited from the expertise of Dalian's badminton coaches but not a peep on China's brutal curbs on freedom of expression, association, and religion, press censorship, and repression in ethnic minority areas in Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia.
If we are to blame Mr Chernyshev for Russian abuses, is Turin's mayor similarly culpable for Italian political corruption and the mass deportation of African immigrants and Roma?
Glasgow's Rostov relationship goes back to 1986, when Russia was under a dictatorship. Like the others it seems borne of a political fad.
Their current usefulness is questionable. But before risking burning bridges Mrs Docherty should equip herself with some diplomatic skills and knowledge.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article