IT was a threat in French, a threat in German and a threat in Spanish.
But not English.
Continental newspapers quickly summed up Chancellor George Osborne's promise to veto a currency union as an act of menace.
Those in the Anglo-Saxon world were more inclined to see it as a fair warning.
"London threatens Scotland with monetary split," announced Le Monde in Paris, explaining that, despite some progress for Yes in the polls, the main worry of Scots was about the effects of independence on the economy.
Germany's Frankfurter Allgemeine said the threats on the pound came from "English politicians". The t-word word was used by Spiegel too and German TV. Russian news wire Lenta was tougher still: Britain would "ban" Scotland from using the pound.
El Universal in Caracas, Venezuela, also said the UK was "threatening" Scotland. The theme was pretty consistent.
Madrid media - which, with one eye on its own breakaway nations, is sometimes fervently pro-union - also saw menaces. But from Holyrood, not Westminster. "Edinburgh has threatened not to pay its debt if it can't use Sterling," said El Mundo, before adding: "The three big UK parties have made common cause in saying they would prevent Scotland from continuing to use their currency if it goes independent."
Catalan media, on the other hand, were more sympathetic to the SNP. Barcelona daily La Vanguardia headlined on Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon saying "It's our currency as much as it is theirs". Mass audience Catalan web newspaper Vilaweb, which supports independence, repeated that London had "threatened" Scotland.
Its editor, Vicent Partal, later saying the English had started to copy the hardline (but very counter-productive) tactics of Spanish conservatives. Was this because Yes was gaining in the polls, he asked.
The slight rise in support for Yes in the polls seems to have piqued the interest of some foreign newspapers - as has the "Good Cop, Bad Cop" rhetoric of Prime Minister Cameron and Mr Osborne.
Italian business daily Il Solo 24 Ore on Thursday ran a feature on Mr Cameron wrapping himself in red, white and blue with the headline: "Scotland, the secession that frightens London."
English-language media in North America was far more generous in its reporting on Mr Osborne.
The Globe and Mail in Canada, which has been consistently highly partisan on Scottish matters, said: "Britain warns Scotland: Forget the pound if you walk away."
It described Mr Osborn's sterling gambit as "the most aggressive attempt yet to scuttle a nationalist bid to break the 307-year-old union with England".
It added: "In the latest salvo of a choreographed British campaign to keep Scotland in the UK, George Osborne sought to play on Scottish fears of losing the pound to argue that secession would cost Scots dearly and cast them into a tempest of volatility." The Washington Post also highlighted the different approaches made by Tory ministers. It said: "Osborne's remarks signal an intensification of the debate over independence and mark a contrast to the "love-bombing" approach of Prime Minister David Cameron."
Some writers, meanwhile, began to wonder what the Osborne gambit would mean. "So what would happen if Scotland kept the pound despite London's refusal?" asked France's La Tribune. "Edinburgh," it concluded, "could declare the British currency as the only legal tender in Scotland." And London, it added, could do nothing about it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article