Keep Death Off the Road.
Keep Death Off the Road. Although we have not yet succeeded in obeying the instruction of this famous road safety slogan, we have over the years taken significant steps in that direction. The number of deaths on the roads in the United Kingdom has come down. They have roughly halved each decade, from 5217 in 1990 to 1713 in 2013.
While this is a considerable achievement, not least when the number of vehicles on the roads has increased every year (apart from 1991) since the end of the Second World War, this reduction has come about as the result of a very wide range of initiatives: powerful and regular road safety education campaigns; better and safer roads; greatly improved car design; introduction of MOT testing; use of speed cameras and of breathalysers; the requirement to use seat belts; child seats and crash helmets on motorcycles; banning the use of mobile phones in cars; and the introduction of new road traffic offences in cases where people are killed or injured by drivers already breaking the law, for example, by driving dangerously or over the drink drive limit.
Whilst all of these and other measures have contributed to bringing down the death and injury rates, they have to be maintained and enforced where appropriate to keep the rates at that level. Other steps have to be taken to achieve a greater reduction. One obvious group to target is those drivers who drive whilst having drunk too much or have taken drugs.
That is why, at the end of 2009, I was asked by the Labour Government in Westminster to conduct a Review of Drink and Drug Driving Law. The world of politics being what it is, by the time my report was submitted in May 2010 it was for the Coalition Government to publish it. Just over half of the 51 recommendations were concerned with drink driving and the rest with drug driving.
There was general acceptance by the Coalition of those relating to drug driving, and steps have now been taken across the UK, for example to create a new offence of driving with a specified drug in the blood above a prescribed legal limit; introduce drug testing kits in police stations; and generally speed up the procedures for dealing with those suspected of drug driving.
As for drink driving, while there has also been progress across the UK in implementing recommendations relating to the procedures for dealing with drink drive offending, the Coalition Government rapidly rejected the major recommendation that the drink drive level should be reduced from 80 milligrams of alcohol to 50 milligrams in 100 millilitres of blood, which in terms of a breathalyser reading means a reduction from 35 to 22 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath.
This decision was taken despite overwhelming support in the evidence given to the review for such a reduction, or even greater reduction, and that such a change would save even more lives each year. Although there were varied estimates of the number of lives likely to be saved, a midpoint figure was that, in the UK, about 100 lives a year would be saved, avoiding approximately five per cent of all road deaths. Failure to change would mean that we, along with Malta, would be the only countries in Europe to have such a high drink drive level.
However, for Scottish road users, all was not lost because, under the Scotland Act 2012, power to set the drink drive level in Scotland was devolved to the Scottish Parliament. Consultation on a proposed reduction to the levels recommended by the Review was set in hand, revealing three-to-one support for a reduction. The Scottish Parliament has decided to implement a move to a new limit of 50 milligrams. This means that, as of today, Scottish roads should be that much safer, given this important further step to reduce deaths and injuries on Scottish roads ?? a great example to the rest of the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article