THE teaching of young earth creationism in Scottish schools has been debated fiercely in recent weeks, but reporting by the media has been somewhat confusing.
The genesis of the discussion was a petition from the Scottish Secular Society (SSS) calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to issue official guidance, as is the case in England and Wales.
The SSS wants the new guidance to "bar the presentation in Scottish publicly-funded schools of separate creation and of young earth doctrines as viable alternatives to the established science of evolution, common descent, and deep time".
The reason given was that the SSS believes schools are now being subjected to what they describe as an "attack" on established scientific theories from imported US doctrines known as creation science and intelligent design.
The SSS said this pressure places school staff in an impossible position and that guidance is necessary to give a clear lead as to what is considered acceptable or unacceptable in science lessons.
In its petition the SSS also quotes "unacceptable" and "scandalous" examples where young earth creationist and explicitly anti-scientific materials have been handed to pupils in a Scottish primary school.
"In all these cases, and no doubt in many others that have not come to our attention, people with the best of intentions will be bringing creationist convictions into schools, and creating an atmosphere where it is difficult or embarrassing for teachers to challenge them. Thus one reason why guidance is needed is to support the teachers themselves against pressures," the petition states.
While this is an entirely legitimate position to hold, and one that is supported by a number of eminent academics, the problem for SSS is that representatives of the very people it is seeking to support came out strongly in opposition to any new guidance.
School Leaders' Scotland (SLS), which represents secondary headteachers, the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS), the country's largest teaching union, and more recently the Scottish Government have all written to the committee outlining their objections.
These organisations have spoken up for the long-standing principle that protection from extremist views in Scottish education relies on the professionalism of teaching staff and the regulatory role of bodies such as local authorities, the General Teaching Council for Scotland and the schools inspectorate. There is also the small matter of the science curriculum which teachers are expected to deliver.
Crucially, the Scottish Government also said there was no evidence young earth creationism had ever been taught in a Scottish science class.
Unfortunately, media reporting of these perspectives has been almost universally poor with the view of the unions and civil service depicted as in some way endorsing the teaching of young earth creationism.
Behind this ill-judged coverage is the rather inconvenient truth that the SSS, Scottish Government, EIS and SLS are all broadly in agreement that theories of young earth creationism have no place in science lessons. It is the mechanism by which we protect pupils from extremist views that is the real bone of contention.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article