There has been a lot of heat and not a lot of light in the debate over Police stop and search tactics.
Just how much we have been in the dark became clear with the admission by Police Scotland chief constable Sir Stephen House that recorded figures have overstated the number of true stop and searches by several hundred thousand a year.
Mr House believes the force is being 'damned' for going further than other forces in the UK and other countries in recording the way officers interact with citizens.
It is worth considering how we got here. Critics claim, with some justification, that an undeclared and still-denied culture of targets has led police officers into a large number of interactions with the public, which have then been recorded as stop and searches.
Now the police are criticised for the impression given that hundreds of thousands of citizens, many of them young people, have been subjected to intrusive encounters. By overusing what can be a useful tactic, the police now seem likely to lose it, with a review mooted of the use of 'consensual' stop and searches, while Police Scotland and the Scottish Government have both already stated they will come to an end.
Yet the political row over stop and search is now in danger of obscuring a more important issue. What really counts is the quality of interactions police have with the public, and what happens next. This applies especially to young people who are putting themselves at risk, as well as potentially causing problems in their community. Are the young people subjected to successful searches signposted to appropriate sources of help or intervention?
The clearest example is a teenager drinking in a public park. Other examples would be an underage youngster searched for so-called legal highs, or cigarettes.
If a 14 year old has obtained alcohol, it is in the child's interest and the public interest for police to find and remove that alcohol. In days past, a police officer who found a young person with alcohol might have confiscated it and marched them home to let their parents know. That remains a decent option. But it is unlikely, if the main goal is simply to record a stop and search, what is really achieved by that?
We should all be concerned if the police are exceeding their powers. But there are situations where it makes sense for police to ask for someone to submit to a voluntary search. If no crime has been committed, records are likely to be limited, but the records appear to have become the main story. This debate about numbers obscures the real issue.
The Scottish Police Authority has asked Mr House to examine what effect targets have had on this issue. There is a debate to be had about whether removing the option of 'consensual' searches will lead police into more confrontations with members of the public.
But we would all benefit far more by asking the police to explain - whether or not there are targets - what such searches really achieve, and how they can contribute to the effectiveness of the force.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article