In a former life before all this foreign hackery, I was once an art historian.
For some years following my graduation from Glasgow School of Art I went on to teach art history at the school and to this day painting, sculpture and fine art generally remain a personal passion.
From ancient sites of antiquity to modern urban galleries whenever possible I still find myself seeking out those works of art that make the heart leap and the mind race.
This last week my two worlds' that of foreign affairs reporting and enthusiasm for art history collided, as news emerged that Islamic State (IS) terrorists were poised to overrun the world heritage site of Palmyra in Syria.
From the 1st to the 2nd century, the art and architecture of this "Venice of the Sands" has stood at the crossroads of several civilisations, marrying Graeco-Roman techniques with local traditions and Persian influences.
Now however, Palmyra's colonnades, sculptures, friezes and temples stand threatened by the hammers, bulldozers and barbarism of the terrorist army that is Islamic State (IS).
Since this news broke no end of writers have made the case that something has to be done to save Palmyra from IS. But others too have raised the thorny question of whether saving priceless antiquity is as important as saving people?
Quite rightly these same observers also ask why it is that the world is suddenly sitting up and taking notice of Syria's plight because of Palmyra, while calls for intervention on a purely humanitarian basis have for years been few and far between.
Back in 2001 I remember a similar furore over the Taliban's then destruction of the great Buddhas of Bamiyan. Many years ago during the Soviet war I once spent a few nights sleeping in the caves at the foot of these monumental statues carved into a cliffside.
When the Taliban dynamited these treasures I like others around the world was appalled. Then too there were calls for intervention to stop the destruction of these irreplaceable antiquities even though the cruelty of the Taliban regime had been visible every Friday in Kabul's national stadium where people were shot, hanged or stoned to death for perceived failure to adhere to the extremists' rule of law.
The IS threat to Palmyra should not be reduced to a debate about who or what is more important, people or priceless antiquities. Of course the saving of human life should always come first. But if art is anything it is about life itself.
I have never been known to agree with Boris Johnson on anything, but he was correct when he wrote this week that what we are witnessing in Syria and Iraq today isn't a clash of civilisations, but a 'struggle between civilisation and nihilism'. Muslims and non-Muslims alike find the scarcely believable cruelty and barbarism of IS an abomination. The treasures of Palmyra like all art, is part of our common human heritage.
To care about people and art is one and the same thing.
As the great British art critic John Ruskin once said: 'Fine art is that in which the hand, the head, and the heart of man go together.'
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article