There is clearly a problem with career progression in Scottish universities when only on in five holders of professorships is female.
The universities themselves understand the need for gender balance at senior levels, having committed to achieving at least 40% female and 40% male membership of governing bodies by 2018. However the opportunity for female academics to reach the very top still appears to be limited in practice.
The promotional structures of higher education are geared in a way which appears to be preventing many women from achieving all that they might. Career breaks to raise a family, as well as a long hours culture and constant pressure to publish may be inadvertently ensuring men - traditionally less restricted by caring roles - are best placed to secure jobs as professors.
The education minister Angela Constance has now written to ask Universities Scotland what plans it has to address the problem. Universities have certainly made attempts to do so, including the Athena SWAN initiative which aims to support the careers of women in science, technology, engineering and maths. But the reality is while women make up approximately half of all university staff, professors are 80 per cent male.
The pace of change is glacial and Mrs Constance is right to call for accelerated action. Progressing to the top of academia, as the University and Colleges Union points out, cannot be incompatible with having children and managing family and caring commitments.
Changes in society would help - changing social attitudes so women are not criticised for balancing family and career, and men are no longer viewed as unusual or ground-breaking if they, rather than a child's mother, take time off to parent. As in many other workplaces, good quality, flexible childcare is also key to ensuring that women are not held back unnecessarily when they do attempt to balance careers with child-rearing.
But the minister's implication is that universities can specifically improve the position of female academics, perhaps by eliminating barriers which by design or accident mitigate against women's progress. A more open-minded flexible attitude to career paths in the sector, would undoubtedly help.
Privately, universities may wonder why the minister is drawing attention to this problem now. It comes at a time when there is high tension over the issue of university governance, and amid warnings from the sector that Government plans could cost higher education £450m in income.
It would not be appropriate for the government to micromanage Scottish higher education, which is an international success story. Many would say the relative autonomy of universities has been an important part of that success.
That has its limits, though, and the protests over the closure of Stirling University's religion course arguably highlight a tendency towards unaccountable decision making and a lack of consultation.
As with the issue of widening access, where government pressure has led to important improvements, there is a place for leaning on universities to modernise more urgently and thoroughly.
Many universities are proud of their long histories, and rightly so. But while government is asking partners to commit to having a 50:50 split on their boards by 2020, the lack of representation of women at senior levels in academia makes them look sadly archaic.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here