I WAS intrigued, and somewhat surprised, by the assertion in the obituary to Elizabeth Burns (The Herald, August 29) that Elizabeth Burns was a”‘direct descendant of our national Bard, Robert Burns”. As a genealogist this sort of contention is of particular interest.
Closer scrutiny reveals Elizabeth Burns’s father “was directly descended from Rabbie’s uncle James”. Robert Burns had 12 children by four women - nine by his wife Jean Armour. Seven of his children were illegitimate, including the first four by Jean Armour, legitimised by their parent’s marriage in 1788. Of Jean's children, six died young and another, William, had no children. The last descendant of their eldest son Robert (1786-1857) was Jean Armour Burns Brown, who died in 1937.
All living descendants of Robert Burns and Jean Armour descend from their granddaughter Sarah Elizabeth Maitland Tombs Burns (1821-1909), daughter of their fourth son James Glencairn Burns (1794-1865). At best Elizabeth Burns is something like a fourth cousin twice removed.
By which logic, I would contend that about five per cent of the Scottish population could claim to be “a direct descendant of our national bard”. Actually most of us are descended from Ghengis Khan … but that is a rant for another day.
Sheila Duffy,
3 Hamilton Drive, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here