HERE’S a question I found myself faced with one recent Saturday night on Twitter: “You meet Angela Haggerty in a pub and she wants to **** you. Here’s your three options – 1.) Take her home; 2.) Kill yourself; 3.) Find a £20 hooker.”
The author of this tweet was a brave, anonymous football fan who has periodically targeted me with similar abhorrent nonsense over the last few years. He’s one of literally hundreds of accounts I’ve blocked in that time for similar, and often far more severe and sinister, abuse.
My crime? Being a mouthy woman who insists on doing her job. That job included editing a book about Rangers’ financial collapse in 2012, which has led to a nearly four-year long sustained campaign of abuse. The most serious episode of it led to a six-month prison sentence for one man who went on an online podcast to deliver a tirade of threatening comments and encourage listeners to do the same, to which they duly obliged, much to my terror one evening when I found myself alone in my home with a stream of men online asking me if I’d ever been sexually assaulted.
From that day to this, despite police involvement and a criminal trial, it hasn’t stopped. Brave men continue to set up accounts on social media with the sole intention of harassing me. They’ve tried to get me sacked from every job I’ve had since 2012, and whenever I appear on radio or television I’m subjected to a fresh slew of hate. Just months after the court case the abuse was so bad after an appearance on a BBC news programme that it was covered by a national newspaper.
Among the abusive terms publishable were “ginger hag”, “one ugly mother”, an “ugly fenian b******” and “a fenian cow”. I’m now told on a regular basis that I’m all of these things and more – munter, c***, boot, etc – and I’ve even been informed by my detractors of not only how much they’d like to see me stabbed, but that I should be under no doubt that I deserve it.
Much is said about the very
particular problem of sexist abuse directed towards women online, but there is curiously little understanding of the effects.
The campaign aimed at me was about trying to silence a journalist – a serious thing in itself – but there was an undercurrent among all of it which revealed a rage that this
journalist had the audacity to be a woman, of all things.
And the pattern is observable across social media. It ranges from the kind of extreme abuse that I, and commentators like feminist Caroline Criado-Perez – who endured an intense period of rape threats that also resulted in criminal convictions – have experienced, to more “casual” sexism and gender stereotyping.
Wherever it falls on the spectrum, these things deliver the same message: women are “other”. Women’s voices have less value. Women are inferior.
Just last week, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon was reduced to a suit by a male news reporter who felt it appropriate to point out that she’d worn the same outfit as a couple of other people. Sturgeon retorted wonderfully with a picture of the reporter wearing the same suit as a politician, remarking: “Oh no, male journalist and male politician wear same suit!”
No matter how little harm the news reporter meant by his remarks – and it was all taken in good humour – for me it still underlined those frustrating prevailing attitudes about what defines women. Those attitudes go on to emerge in their most concentrated form online.
Social media has created a space that women and men can access equally, but the choice of so many men to use that technological platform to threaten and humiliate their equals highlights the challenge still facing women at a most basic level.
We could call on social networks themselves to do more to tackle it, and there are some improvements that could be made, but they aren’t really the problem. Those networks
have simply provided a platform
for the problem to show itself. It is driven by a deep-rooted
misogyny within our society that doesn’t simply stop when the laptop is switched off.
What is required is for both men and women to stand up to this abuse online when it occurs; for employers to show unwavering support to staff who must use social media in their jobs and be uncompromising about who is to blame for these attitudes.
Women are not the problem.
We do not bring this on ourselves, we do not deserve it and we should never be required to change our
behaviour or lower our voices to
placate the intolerant misogynist mob.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article