By Dave Gorman
JUST two months after a historic Paris Climate Summit that saw worldwide recognition of humanity’s need to keep global warming below 2°C, a new record has been set: February 2016 was earth’s hottest month since modern records began.
The International Panel of Climate Change’s (IPCC) latest report indicates that human emissions are extremely likely to have been the dominant cause of observed global warming since the mid-20th century. It’s a concern I share with my colleagues across Edinburgh University and across the world.
Climate change is undoubtedly one of the world’s greatest challenges. So, what are we doing about it?
As one of the UK’s top universities, the University of Edinburgh takes its impact on the environment very seriously, from the teaching and research that we do, to how we run the university sustainably and on to the investments that we make.
That last aspect – our finances – have received a lot of attention over the last year. It’s this topic that I’m looking forward to grappling with today at the Edinburgh International Science Festival.
A number of critics have said that a top university like Edinburgh should use its influence to change the world, and that the best way to do this is to divest from fossil fuels and armaments. In this first aspect, at least, we agree.
In 2015 the university signalled its intention to use its investments and procurement leverage to support the transition to a low carbon economy. This included selling stocks worth £2.5 million in order to divest from coal and tar sands companies and committing to exploring further means to reduce the carbon footprint of our investments. Unlike others who added conditions and long timescales to similar decisions, we divested within months. There were no unrealistic promises.
Since then, an external review of our investments shows that exposure to fossil fuels in the university’s direct investments has halved since 2013, and fallen by almost 90 per cent since 2008. We also maintain an exclusion list based on the well-recognised Fossil Fuel Index for coal and tar sands.
In December 2015, the university completed the transfer to the Global Alpha Fund Choice, which means that we no longer directly invest in armaments, tobacco, gambling and pornography.
There’s still some genuinely felt differences here, but we have adopted an approach which we feel allows switch and appropriate action. The university wanted to reduce the carbon footprint of its investments, choosing a focused evidence-based approach in preference to untargeted and unproven divestment.
We recognised the potential risk of climate change to investments – the so-called stranded assets argument – often put forth by divestment campaigners. Following our 2014 consultation, we have worked with our professional advisers Mercer to review the degree of exposure of our endowment fund to climate change. They conclude that our portfolio is significantly better placed to adjust to climate risks than the industry average.
But of course, the work the university does to tackle climate change goes way beyond our investments. The university has brought in research funding worth an estimated £50 million in the last seven years on climate science, emissions mitigation and adaption research, and spent £20 million on low carbon energy solutions on our campuses, reducing the university’s carbon emissions by almost 10,000 tonnes annually. We announced another £11m funding for low carbon energy this week.
The university is also home to several centres of energy and climate expertise, undertakes ground-breaking research into renewable energy and provides innovative programmes of teaching in carbon management, meaning one of our greatest assets – our students – get to learn about, and shape, sustainable alternatives and solutions to climate change.
The threat of climate change is very real for all of us. As an institution we are committed to making a difference in dealing with global challenges; to reviewing the evidence and identifying what we can do to make a difference according to our values, and then taking action swiftly and effectively. We reject simplistic solutions in favour of longer-term, effective action and we urge others to join us in this approach.
Dave Gorman is Director of Social Responsibility and Sustainability at the University of Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel