THE closure of Longannet power station last week drew a line under a century of coal-fired electricity production in Scotland.
The plant, which was in operation in Fife for 46 years, was the last of its generation.
For many of its employees, the switch off was an emotional end of an era. However, for rail campaigners in the region, it also signalled the end of an obstacle which had stood in the way of passenger rail services returning to West Fife.
They are calling on transport chiefs to fund the creation of a number of new passenger platforms along the Forth Circle, hogged for years by Longannet's coal trains.
By adding platforms at Crossford, Cairneyhill, Torryburn, Valleyfield, Culross and Kincardine, they believe the Forth Circle can be "transformed into a critical link from Dunfermline to Kincardine servicing the Fife villages with nominal expense".
The project would restore a direct link between the Fife Circle and the Alloa-Stirling lines, in turn opening up a neglected corner of Scotland to rail connections with Glasgow and Edinburgh.
Martin Keatings, the Cairneyhill resident who has petitioned the Scottish Parliament to back the development, described it as a "win-win" last year.
"The line is already there and the only barrier to it being used was Longannet," he said. "I’m asking ‘why not?’ The infrastructure is already in place, all that’s required is the platforms. It makes sense and would give all of us in the villages better links to transport."
Although Transport Scotland responded in December 2015 that the reopening of the Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine line through to Dunfermline for passenger services "does not feature in the current investment programme", the agency added that the project was "likely to be considered" as part of a Fife Council-led appraisal into efforts to mitigate against the economic fallout of Longannet's closure.
The proposal comes against a backdrop of increasing calls for axed and disused lines around Scotland to be reinstated following the success of the new Borders Railway.
Passenger numbers for the Edinburgh-Tweedbank route have already outstripped projections with the railway carrying 500,000 in its first five months of operation - compared to the 650,000 forecasted for the first full year.
Rail campaigners were far from surprised that demand exceeded official expectations, however, and have insisted the Borders case simply highlights the appetite among commuters and leisure travellers for an expanded rail network.
Ironically, the Waverley Line - the basis for the new Borders Railway - was axed in 1969, the year before Longannet opened. And just as it reopens, Longannet closes - with both those actions now forming the basis of arguments to reverse various Beeching cuts.
In Levenmouth, campaigners want a five-mile track linking Leven and Thornton reinstated, while lobbyists in St Andrews are calling for Scotland's oldest university town and golfing jewel to rejoin the rail network for the first time since 1969.
The so-called 'StARLink' line would not only enable direct services from St Andrews to Edinburgh and Dundee, but - if the Forth Rail Link also became a reality - it would facilitate direct services between Glasgow and St Andrews.
If any of these links have the potential to replicate the Borders Railway's success, surely they are worth considering?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel