Do you remember your favourite picture book from childhood? What are the books your children or grandchildren clamour for you to read to them now? Now imagine you took all the pictures away, would those books be just the same?
Of course not. Children love looking at the pictures. They love dressing up to look like characters they see in books. And yet, a blog or news story might show a photograph of a child in an iconic character costume and mention the writer but not the illustrator, who co-created the much loved image. What could be wrong with this?
A lot, say illustrators. What if the books are beloved as much for the illustrator’s pictures as they are for the writer’s words? By cutting out any mentions of the illustrators, we’re losing something very important.
Firstly, children lose a hero. Not all youngsters come to stories and books through words. If you put blank paper in front of children and tell them to "write a story", many of them will panic.
But when I visit schools and walk them through the steps of drawing their own character, it looks back at them off the page. Suddenly their character is ALIVE!
They start thinking about its personality, what kind of food it likes, if it has any friends. Then stories come bubbling out of them and the paper is there to catch the words that come tumbling out.
Children who don’t immediately love books may meet an illustrator and be inspired to create their own books. But if they don’t even know illustrating is a real job, this can’t happen. I find many kids have no idea how the pictures come about, in the same way city kids might think eggs comes from the supermarket or milk from a bottle.
Secondly, we lose our illustrators. Times have changed in publishing. Everything is about "branding" and "name recognition". If people don’t know the name of an illustrator, they won’t ask for their books. Television crews will only invite the writer to speak on telly, even if they spend half the time oo’ing and ah’ing over the book’s pictures.
Schools won’t think to ask illustrators to visit, and many writers and illustrators supplement small incomes with the fees they earn for visiting schools and inspiring children.
Margins are tight; if top illustrators can’t earn a living, we’ll lose some of our best talent. The books you read to your children won’t be as good as they could be.
Thirdly, we lose diversity in our books. It can take years, even a decade, to earn enough money in illustration to live on. By forgetting to mention illustrators, we make that career path take even longer; that limits the job to people who have family money or an earning partner to sustain them through the first hard years, and to those who can afford to live near London publishing houses.
That’s not right; we and our children need to encounter stories and pictures created by people who live in the furthest reaches of Scotland, from people who aren’t well off, from single people, from people from non-white backgrounds.
Simply remembering to credit illustrators may seem like a stretch in trying to achieve this, but it plays its part.
Last year I decided I had to do something. I talked with talented illustrator colleagues who were working flat-out, dirt-poor, at breaking point. They were wondering if they could keep their jobs when everyone seemed to be against them. I thought, this is nuts.
People think very fondly of illustrated books and they wouldn’t want to see these people crushed! So I set up a Twitter campaign called #PicturesMeanBusiness, to get illustrators properly credited by teachers, reviewers, the media.
Even when you’re reading to kids, it can help us if you point out the names of both the people who created the book in your hands, give your child a little insight into who created that story told in both words and pictures. Find out how you can help at www.picturesmeanbusiness.com.
Author and illustrator Sarah McIntyre is currently touring with The Scottish Friendly Children’s Book Tour sponsored by Scottish Friendly Assurance and organised by the Scottish Book Trust.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here