Local rights and opinions are little by little being eroded by the Scottish Government. Despite purporting to be championing "community empowerment", they are, by stealth, actively removing what little we have.
With regard to large industrial wind developments over 50MW (Section 36 Applications determined by ministers), like the 67 turbine controversial Stronelairg, the Scottish Government has adopted a change of procedure for notifying the public of Further Environmental Information (FEI) . They are now saying this will be advertised only once. If any new information comes along, the public will need to search for it on frequently less than perfect council websites. Many S36 applications are in the Highlands – the land of the snail-paced broadband where opening or downloading large and complicated files is nigh-on impossible. Even if we manage to eventually get access, will the councils have uploaded this information quickly or correctly? Is there a further deadline if new information is made available and how will the public know? Is this a ruse to prevent the local people being able to have sight of what they need in order to make an objection in a timely manner?
There is already serious doubt that Scotland is compliant with EU directives regarding access to justice. This access to FEI, which effectively denies the public a proper part in the planning process, may not be compliant with Access to Information. Where was the public consultation on this matter? Has COSLA agreed to it? Has the new policy been incorporated into a planning circular?
Has the Scottish Government leapfrogged public opinion in order to impose something that yet again favours the wind developer over the local people?
Mary Young
Killearn
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel