NICOLA Sturgeon said at the National Economic Forum in Inverness on May 12 that communities are "central" to the planning policy of renewable energy …“and we have a planning process that is robust … and allows the views of communities to be heard". Nothing could be further from the truth. In 2007 the SNP inherited a planning policy which said “broad criteria should be used to set out the considerations that developers should address in relation to local communities. These should ensure that (windfarm) proposals are not permitted if they would have a significant long-term detrimental impact on the amenity of people living nearby.” This positive protection to residential amenity was removed by the publication of Scottish Planning Policy in 2010.
In 2011, Scottish Government Reporters examining Highland Council’s draft Highland Wide Development Plan wrote on page 449 at paragraph 36: “With respect to representations arguing for a veto on wind farm proposals in some circumstances where the local community opposes the scheme, this would be contrary to the planning system as set out in legislation. A council must make its own planning decisions on the basis of policies and reasons; it cannot set aside that responsibility and simply adopt the opinions of a local community.”
So in spite of extensive consultation and invitation for comment, the planning authority must ignore the expressed wish of the community.
Since 2014 Scottish Planning Policy provides for consideration of visual impact within two kilometres of “cities, towns and villages” but also says that “in these areas wind farms may be appropriate in some circumstances”. Scattered settlements all over Scotland are excluded from this negotiable consideration masquerading as a protection to amenity. The wish of the community is not a material consideration in Scottish Planning Policy. The wishes of the community may well be heard but there is no requirement to heed them. The First Minister knows that.
Stuart Young,
The Larches, Laggan Bridge, Newtonmore.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel