I MUST respond to the sneering comments directed at me by Marianne Taylor ("Let Baby Boomers pay for better mental health services", The Herald, May 14). She talks of "older people ... who have benefited so generously from the housing market".
I, like many of my generation, was the first of my family to reach university. Having graduated and undergone teacher training I began work in the early 1970s. My first month's pay was £69. I had to work four nights a week teaching night classes to make ends meet. There were no foreign holidays, little pocket money for children, no luxuries.
I claimed no benefits, never made an insurance claim and remained in debt my entire working life. I was absent a total of 10 days in 40 years. The first day I was debt-free was the day I received my pension lump sum, having worked a full 40 years.
I enjoyed my working life, I chose it and found it rewarding.
What I do not accept is that I should be subjected to this insult and by the continuing use of the opprobrious tag "Baby Boomer" which, like all such journalese, is meaningless.
Alice Watt,
70 Newton Street, Greenock.
I AGREE with the view of Allan Sutherland (Letters, May 12) regarding obesity being related to an ageing population and lack of money.
I have just returned from a holiday in a four-star hotel in Cyprus. The guests were probably 90 per cent British and most of the over-thirties were overweight and some of the fifties to sixties were extremely obese. This had no relation to poverty or ageing as many were talking about holidays in the United States or Dubai. They did not seem to care and I wonder how obese their children will be and what health issues they will have.
I have no answer about the answer to this problem and can only see it getting worse.
Malcolm Rankin,
107 Ardrossan Road, Seamill.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel