I READ with incredulity Andrew Thin’s defence of Steve Dunlop’s stewardship of Scottish Canals (Letters, May 15).
Like Mr Thin, I cycle frequently along the canal towpath. It is certainly a more peaceful if less interesting cycle than it used to be given the lack of boats navigating its waters.
I remember the fanfare which accompanied the joining of the Union and Forth and Clyde canals. Much was made of the fact that, once again, boats could navigate from east coast to west coast and the benefits to tourism and the like it would bring. It was exciting to bring the canals’ original purpose back to life again;
for surely the raison d'etre of a linked canal system is for boats to be able to navigate it.
Mr Thin cites Mr Dunlop’s achievements and defends the closing of the canal to navigable traffic as being down to merely the failure of a couple of humble bearings. Has he never heard the proverb “For the want of a nail…”?
If he is such a fan of Mr Dunlop, does he not realise that for the want of a bearing (or two) many of Mr Dunlop’s achievements, of which Mr Thin vigorously reminds us, could be lost. Was it not in his remit to budget a small part of all that wonderful income he was responsible for generating by housing development and so on for basic maintenance?
Interest in the canals will soon wane if it becomes simply a moribund museum piece and it is in danger of so becoming.
William Thomson,
25 Lithgow Place, Denny.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel