IN November 2014, just a few days before she became First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon made an important promise. For too long, she said, the conversation between the public and politicians had been all about stage-managed public appearances and she was determined to change that. Her government would be open, she said; it would stay close to the people it served, and, what’s more, Ms Sturgeon was prepared to promise that she would be the most accessible First Minister ever.
So what are we to make of the promise now? Four years on, what was supposed to be the most accessible government ever has been accused by the freedom watchdog of operating unjustifiable and significant delays to the freedom of information system. Daren Fitzhenry, the information commissioner, says SNP ministers have effectively been operating a twin-track system making it harder for journalists, MSPs and political researchers to get information. Mr Fitzhenry says FOI requests from these groups are subjected to an extra layer of clearance.
Journalists who have been using the FOI system have known about this shocking problem for a long time, with this newspaper revealing in May that requests were regularly being sent to special advisers and ministers for approval. Last year journalists from across the media also signed an open letter criticising the government’s approach, with MSPs subsequently condemning its conduct in an unanimous vote in parliament.
However, to have the concerns confirmed by the commissioner is profoundly troubling and requires immediate action by the Scottish Government. In May, the Government was still trying to pooh-pooh any suggestion that requests from journalists were treated differently but it now says it accepts the commissioner’s recommendations in full and will try to improve.
As the commissioner says, this must mean an end to treating journalists and others differently when processing requests – and the only way to achieve this is maybe to ensure an element of anonymity is introduced to the system. This will be embarrassing for the Government, and lead to the publication of some stories it would rather keep quiet – but that is the nature of the system. Freedom of information means the government cooperating even with those who may embarrass them.
The entire system also requires review. Journalists now know that what they suspected is true, but the concerns go further, with some organisations wrongly informing the public they do not hold data when in fact they do. The Government will now prepare an action plan on the back of the commissioner’s report, but it should go further and order a review of FOI as a whole. FOI has to work for journalists, but it should mean openness for all. The Government must now tell us how it will live up to those promises Nicola Sturgeon made in 2014.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here