By Callum Chomczuk, Deputy Director, Chartered Institute of Housing Scotland
THE announcement from Serco that it will pause plans to evict asylum seeks from their homes in Glasgow has brought the UK Government’s asylum and immigration policies back into the headlines.
As charities, local government, housing organisations and the people of Glasgow attempt to stop these evictions, it is worth reminding ourselves of the one of the most contentious aspects of the UK Government’s immigration policies; the right to rent.
This hangs over tenants in Scotland and if the Home Office sticks to its plans, housing associations and private landlords will be required to check the varied types of document that prove someone’s legal status.
Landlords in England are now obliged to review documentation of anyone taking up a new tenancy, which means that they become de-facto immigration enforcement officers. Whether these rules are part of the “hostile environment” created by Theresa May or are now part of the “compliance environment” announced by Sajid Javid, the reality is the rules require checks on people’s immigration status when they go for a job, open a bank account, seek medical care or rent a home. And if a landlord were to refuse to carry out such a check they could be forced to pay a penalty of up to £3,000 or face a prison sentence of up to five years.
Despite the Home Office announcing that a roll-out was imminent over a year ago, it has not been extended to Scotland. Part of the delay is undoubtedly that separate tenancy laws in Scotland require a different approach.
But events since then have perhaps given the Home Office pause for thought. While the problems exposed by the Windrush scandal didn’t focus on the right to rent, several of those affected lost tenancies because of it. Already there have been steps back from how the policy applies in hospitals and banks.
There have also been two more direct attacks on the scheme. First, a report from the Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration in March called into question whether it was having any impact on illegal immigration, and criticised the lack of monitoring arrangements. David Bolt, the inspector, said it had “yet to demonstrate its worth”. As a result, a cross-party group called for the scheme to be reviewed.
Then, in June, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants won permission to take the Home Office to court for its failure to monitor the right to rent, in particular whether it is leading to discrimination. In an unusual alliance, the London-based Residential Landlords’ Association (RLA) has backed the case and acknowledged that landlords are likely to discriminate if faced with fines or imprisonment for not making proper checks.
Following the conflict with Holyrood over the return of powers from the EU, it’s quite possible that, even if the Home Office doesn’t drop the scheme in England, it will hesitate to extend it to Scotland.
Indeed one of the first acts of Sajid Javid as Home Secretary was to state he does not like the phrase “hostile environment” and that it does not reflect our values as a country.
However, today, the right to rent remains the policy of the UK Government. The only way to have a clean break with the “hostile environment” policies is for the Home Secretary to publicly abandon this policy and commit to an immigration system that has dignity and fairness at its core.
Until such a statement is forthcoming, whether or not Scottish landlords will need to carry out immigration checks remains in the balance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here