By Dr Lesley Morrison, Medact Scotland
TODAY at Faslane nuclear base on the Clyde thousands of people from all over the world will gather to protest about Trident and say “Nae nukes anywhere”. Among the demonstrators will be many health professionals who see it as part of their professional responsibility to speak out about disarmament. To care, not just for individual patients and their families, but their communities and the wider world. As the GMC states, the duty of a doctor is “to protect and promote the health of patients and the public”.
Their message will be “Treatment not Trident, “Beds not bombs”. The billions of pounds being spent on these obscene weapons of mass destruction is money desperately needed by our health and social services. At a time when the health service is under so much pressure is it not, to say the very least, strange that so much taxpayers’ money is being spent on a weapons system which many military experts agree is ineffective in dealing with terrorism and the other very real threats in the modern world? But somehow people have become used to it. The nuclear submarines have been lying there, ominously, for so long that they have become accepted. The horrific elephant, not in the room, but in the Clyde.
In the same way that smoking was accepted as a normal part of life until doctors began to speak out about the risks and people’s behaviour began to change, doctors are speaking out about the risks of nuclear weapons. And, in the same way that the tobacco industry did not like hearing what they had to say, the arms industry is unhappy that the truth, about the potential catastrophic health effects and about the profits of the arms industry, is being revealed.
As we watch terrible footage of the storms wreaking havoc in several parts of the world our concern about climate change, and the urgency to do something about it, grows. Why divert medical activist energy into disarmament? Because the issues of disarmament, militarism, climate change and the environment are inextricably interlinked. They are all issues of human rights and social justice. The poorest in the world suffer most from all of them.
If the international technical expertise and resources being devoted to producing weapons of mass destruction were diverted to solving the problem of climate change we would all be safer. If conflicts, stoked by arms traders and destroying environments, were prevented, the natural and political world would be more stable.
Medact is an organisation of doctors and health professionals who are working hard to make this connection, to use their voice to try to make the world a better, fairer, safer place. And they are not a lonely, fringe organisation of fuzzy-thinking lefties in the international medical community. They are supported by the BMA and the WMA (World Medical Association), affiliates of IPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War), winners of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1985 and ICAN (International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons), this year’s Nobel Peace Prize winner.
At a public Medact meeting in Glasgow last night Pete Ritchie, executive director of Nourish Scotland, spoke about food as an issue of human rights. The world has enough food to feed all its people. The fact that it is used as a profit-making commodity and not distributed as needed means that millions starve.
We have to start putting people before profit. And taking that health message to the military industrial complex exemplified by Trident on the Clyde is a good place to start.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel