DAVID J Crawford (Letters, December 11) suggests that David Mundell appears to need an elephant and all the trappings. Crowd-funding should take place to raise the ante.
In the early 1950s I was taken, under protest, to visit London Zoo, in Regents Park. I went in a quite happy young girl and came out a very sad one. I had seen baby Brumas with her mother (Brumas was female) and that was the start of the unhappiness as I watched the mother pacing to-and-fro across her caged area and each time she got to the side she would bang her head on the bars, turn and pace back again; bang; to and fro; awful to watch her. Then we saw Sir Winston Churchill’s lion Rota. Donated to the zoo as a tame lion it was sad to see Rota in a cage looking bored. What about Guy the Gorilla, a magnificent animal, but again that "dead" look in his eyes? The only light relief was a compound of small monkeys who frisked about, climbing and jumping on each other. With my child’s eyes I watched the lady monkeys having a good time and a "man" monkey doing something odd with himself at the top of a tall tree trunk. Daddy wouldn’t say what. A woman came from the catering place with a tea-towel and flapped it at the naughty monkey who bared his teeth and screeched. There was also an elephant with a large structure on its back carrying several people. It looked rather miserable. Did I want a ride? No, I wanted to get out of that place as fast as possible.
Rather than bothering some poor elephant with a howdah and a mahout perhaps the "crowd-funded" cash could be put to renting a donkey and saddle for Mr Mundell and the rest donated to an animal sanctuary. Yes, David J Crawford was only joking but those memories from childhood are sad ones, of sad animals. Things haven’t changed very much.
Thelma Edwards,
Old Comrades Hall,
Hume, Kelso.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here