SO Glasgow University researchers have found that four years of stricter alcohol limits for drivers has had zero effect on the accident rate (" Law change on alcohol has failed to make our roads safer", The Herald, December 13). The researchers have postulated that the reason for this result is insufficient publicity and a less than draconian police presence. However, they offer no evidence to support these conclusions.
I would suggest that Occam's Razor applies here. The most obvious reason is that the statistics utilised to justify the reduction in alcohol levels were irrelevant to the causation of the accidents. Drivers were breathalysed whether at fault in an accident or not. They were and still are breathalysed the next morning despite the fact that there is no research which indicates impaired driving ability after this period of time.
Given these factors the most obvious conclusion is that alcohol was not a factor in the vast majority of accidents. Politicians succumbed to single-issue pressure groups and claimed they were merely falling in line with European legislation but omitted to mention that in Europe there is a sliding scale of punishment before the driving ban. Once again the motorist has been demonised and the Glasgow University research underlines just how badly though- out the legislation is.
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent, Prestwick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel