THIS was no fond, misty-eyed farewell by seven MPs to the party that had been their home for years. One said he was “sickened that the Labour Party is now a racist, anti-Semitic party.” They denounced the quality of leadership provided – or not provided – by Jeremy Corbyn, and said his economic policies were incoherent. One said it would be “irresponsible” to allow Mr Corbyn to occupy Number 10. For some of them, his position on Brexit was the final straw.
So, is this a vanity project or, possibly, a meaningful moment in British politics? Breakaway parties are not always long-term successes but this one feels important, even if only for symbolic reasons. Theresa May’s fumbling towards a Brexit deal has impressed very, very few people. Mr Corbyn has Momentum on his side but his more contentious policies and attitudes, and his perceived slowness in dealing with serious allegations of bullying and anti-Semitism, have led to this breach.
It will be interesting to see whether the Independent Group is joined by other Labour MPs or by Conservative malcontents. Will it prompt an urgent rethink among Mr Corbyn’s senior allies and the major Labour-supporting unions as to how further defections can be avoided? Might it be the start of the long-rumoured centrist party, especially if no Brexit deal can be agreed upon? If that happens, will we see this new party merging with, or even engineering a reverse takeover of, the Liberal Democrats?
The new grouping needs to seize the moment if it is not to be seen as a seven-day wonder; a clear manifesto and the election of a leader would help. But its assertion that British politics is broken is one that warrants serious thought.
As Shirley Williams, who knows a thing or two about splitting from Labour, said yesterday, the “extreme tribalism” of the last two years has left the public in despair. Quite where the solution lies is anyone’s guess but this breakaway suggests there is, at least, an appetite for a better way.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel