IT is now 50 years since Glasgow College of Nautical Studies was opened by Lord Mountbatten and this week his great-niece the Princess Royal toured the Riverside campus to launch a year of celebrations. Some of the former students she met at the site were there at the official opening in 1969 and 50 years on, as part of the merged City of Glasgow College, the campus is still doing what it has always done: offering excellent educational opportunities to many thousands of students.
However, in the college sector as a whole there is much less to celebrate. Funding is way down on where it was 10 years ago. There has been a massive drop in student numbers and staff, and the financial support available to the students who are still there has been failing to keep up with demand. Part-time courses have also been slashed, which is particularly regrettable as they are often the only option for students from deprived backgrounds.
On top of all of that, the sector is facing disruption over the pay dispute between management and lecturers. The lecturers’ union is demanding that salaries increase to reflect the rising cost of living while the Government says what the union is demanding is unreasonable. It means the mood is acrimonious and the future uncertain.
What makes it worse is the college sector is so important. Not only does it have a central role to play in meeting Scotland’s skills shortage, colleges provide an essential route into education and work for thousands of Scots from vulnerable or deprived backgrounds. With the attainment gap still a huge problem in Scotland, colleges have a central role to play in reducing it.
However, their capacity to do so will be severely limited as long as the sector is under-funded. The Princess Royal saw some of the excellent facilities available at the City of Glasgow’s Riverside campus, but the flexibility that colleges have shown in dealing with shrinking budgets can only go so far. If the college sector is to recover and go on to thrive in the next 50 years, then it will need a much greater show of support from the Scottish Government.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel